Gemma 4 12B vs Grounded SAM
Compare Gemma 4 12B and Grounded SAM side-by-side.
Compare Gemma 4 12B vs Grounded SAM live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
Gemma 4 12B vs Grounded SAM: Overview
Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.
This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.
Grounded SAM is an open-vocabulary image segmentation model developed by IDEA Research, released in January 2024 under the Apache 2.0 license. It combines Grounding DINO, a zero-shot open-vocabulary object detector, with the Segment Anything Model to produce precise segmentation masks for objects identified through free-form text prompts. The two models are used sequentially: Grounding DINO localizes objects from a text query, and SAM generates the corresponding segmentation masks.
Grounded SAM enables zero-shot instance segmentation without task-specific training data, making it applicable to domains where labeled segmentation data is scarce. It supports arbitrary text queries and can segment objects not represented in standard training sets. The model is commonly used in automated labeling pipelines, robotic perception, and domain-specific vision applications requiring open-vocabulary segmentation.
Gemma 4 12B vs Grounded SAM Comparison Table
| Property | Gemma 4 12B | Grounded SAM |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | IDEA Research | |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jun 2026 | Jan 2024 |
| Context Window | — | — |
| Parameters | 12B | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Vision Language | ||
| Captioning | ||
| OCR | ||
| Visual Question Answering | ||
| Zero Shot Segmentation | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Zero-shot Detection | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Overall Score | 62.69% | |
| Avg Response Time | 6.88s | |
| Defect Detection | 73.3%(11/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 88.9%(8/9) | |
| Object Counting | 10%(1/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 78.6%(11/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 57.9%(11/19) | |