Roboflow

Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 4 31B

Compare Gemma 3 12B and Gemma 4 31B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 4 31B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 3 12B
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 4 31B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 4 31B: Overview

Gemma 3 12B

Gemma 3 12B, announced by Google DeepMind on March 12, 2025, is part of the open-weight Gemma 3 family, designed to provide a balance between capability and accessibility. With around 12 billion parameters, it supports multimodal input (text + images) and outputs text, making it useful for reasoning, summarization, Q&A, and visual understanding tasks. The model supports an input context of 128,000 tokens and typically generates up to ~8,000 tokens in output.

The 12B variant is instruction-tuned (“Gemma-3-12B-IT”) and optimized for multilingual use across more than 140 languages. It can run on a single GPU or TPU, offering a lighter compute footprint than very large proprietary models, while still achieving strong performance in reasoning benchmarks. Quantized and lower-precision variants are available to improve efficiency. Limitations include smaller output lengths relative to input capacity, scaling hardware needs at larger sizes, and performance below massive proprietary models on the most complex multimodal or reasoning-heavy tasks.

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B is the largest dense model in Google's Gemma 4 family, built from the same research as Gemini 3 and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license. It supports a 256K token context window with text and image input, configurable thinking mode for step-by-step reasoning, and multilingual support across 140+ languages. The unquantized model fits on a single 80GB GPU.

For vision tasks, Gemma 4 31B supports image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and can output structured bounding boxes for UI element detection, making it useful for document parsing and UI understanding. Compared to Gemma 3, it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance. It is part of a four-size family alongside the 26B A4B MoE variant and two on-device models (E2B, E4B), with the 31B dense variant optimized for output quality and fine-tuning over inference speed.

Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 4 31B Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 3 12BGemma 4 31B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2025Apr 2026
Context Window128K256K
Parameters12B31B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050$0.120
Output $/1M$0.150$0.350
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
classificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
67.16%
Avg Response Time34.59s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens169
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
84.72%
Avg Response Time11.82s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290
Median output tokens131
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
86.9%(86/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
85%(51/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology