Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo
Compare Gemini 3 Flash and GLM 5V Turbo side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.
Compare Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo on Vision Evals
Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash leads 64.9% to 31.8%.
Overall, Gemini 3 Flash averages 75.5% (#11 of 33) against 65.3% (#25 of 33) for GLM 5V Turbo.
Gemini 3 Flash is both cheaper ($0.0021 vs $0.0031 per sample) and faster (4.1s vs 6.3s per sample).
Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo Comparison Table
Evals updated August 26, 2026Pricing updated August 26, 2026
| Property | Gemini 3 Flash | GLM 5V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Dec 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 200K |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.500 | $1.20 |
| Output $/1M | $3.00 | $4.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 75.5% | 65.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0021 | $0.0031 |
| Avg speed / sample | 4.10s | 6.35s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 42.6% $0.0031 | 56.5% $0.0052 |
| Counting | 67.6% $0.0012 | 48.6% $0.0017 |
| Identification | 93.8% $0.0009 | 84.4% $0.0015 |
| OCR | 87.6% $0.0024 | 89.3% $0.0030 |
| Data Extraction | 96.9% $0.0008 | 81.4% $0.0018 |
| Reasoning (low) | 64.9% $0.0020 | 31.8% $0.0017 |
| Reasoning (high) | 74.2% $0.0040 | 49.7% $0.0069 |
Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM 5V Turbo: Overview
Gemini 3 Flash is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by Google through Google DeepMind, designed to deliver fast, cost-efficient reasoning across real-time products and developer workflows. Released in December 2025, it is the Flash-tier variant of the Gemini 3 family, balancing low latency with reasoning quality approaching Pro models.
The model supports text, images, audio, and video, with an exceptionally large context window of roughly one million input tokens and outputs up to ~65k tokens. It emphasizes rapid responses for coding, summarization, analysis, and agentic tasks, and exposes configurable “thinking levels” via API to trade speed for deeper reasoning. Today, Gemini 3 Flash positions itself as a high-throughput, production-ready model, serving as the default in the Gemini app and Google Search’s AI Mode, optimized for scalable, interactive AI applications.
GLM-5V-Turbo is a native multimodal model from Z.ai that extends the GLM family with joint image, video, and text input aimed at vision-centered coding and agent workflows. The model reads screenshots, design drafts, document layouts, and interface captures and generates runnable code from them, covering tasks such as turning a visual design into a working front end, diagnosing rendering and layout defects from screen captures, and operating graphical user interfaces during long-horizon agent runs. It accepts roughly 200,000 input tokens and can emit up to 131,072 output tokens in a single response, which supports sessions that hold specifications, source files, logs, and visual references at the same time.
Training includes a joint reinforcement learning stage spanning more than 30 tasks simultaneously, an approach Z.ai describes as a way to counter the trade-off in which improving visual recognition degrades programming ability and the reverse. Reported evaluations cover pure-text coding on the backend, frontend, and repository exploration tracks of CC-Bench-V2, together with agent execution suites such as PinchBench, ClawEval, and ZClawBench, indicating that text coding behavior is retained after visual input is added.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3 Flash performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 75.5% (#11 of 33) against 65.3% (#25 of 33) for GLM 5V Turbo. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Gemini 3 Flash leads with 64.9% against 31.8%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0021 per sample against $0.0031. Gemini 3 Flash is priced at $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $3.00 per 1M output; GLM 5V Turbo is priced at $1.20 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
Gemini 3 Flash is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.1s per inference against 6.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.