Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max
Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.
Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max on Vision Evals
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on 3 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 84.1% to 73.5%.
Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash averages 86.6% (#1 of 24) against 84.0% (#2 of 24) for Qwen3.8 Max.
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper ($0.0074 vs $0.011 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster (5.8s vs 18.0s per sample).
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max Comparison Table
Evals updated August 3, 2026Pricing updated August 5, 2026
| Property | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | May 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 984K |
| Parameters | 2.4T total, ~95B active | |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.50 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $9.00 | $6.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 86.6% | 84.0% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.011 | $0.0074 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.82s | 18.02s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 68.7% $0.016 | 77.1% $0.013 |
| Counting | 81.1% $0.0075 | 82.4% $0.0046 |
| Identification | 100.0% $0.0042 | 90.6% $0.0027 |
| OCR | 91.1% $0.016 | 92.8% $0.0056 |
| Data Extraction | 94.8% $0.0037 | 87.6% $0.0029 |
| Reasoning (low) | 84.1% $0.0080 | 73.5% $0.0047 |
| Reasoning (high) | 82.8% $0.017 | 80.8% $0.011 |
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max: Overview
Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.
Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.
Qwen3.8 Max is the flagship tier of Alibaba's Qwen3.8 family, a sparse mixture-of-experts multimodal model with roughly 2.4 trillion total parameters of which about 95 billion activate per token, which keeps serving cost and latency well below what the total parameter count would imply. It builds on the architectural foundation established by Qwen3.5 and accepts text, images, video, and documents as input while producing text output. Reported context handling reaches close to one million tokens, with a maximum generation length of 131,072 tokens, so the model is aimed at long-horizon agentic work such as repository-scale coding, multi-step research, data analysis, and office document workflows.
For vision work the model performs image and video understanding, document and chart interpretation, text recognition inside images, and grounded visual question answering, and Alibaba reports gains concentrated in multimodal and agentic evaluation categories rather than general reasoning. Published figures include 86.6 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 67.7 on SWE-bench Pro, 93.0 on PaperBench, 82.8 on IFBench, and 92.6 on GPQA Diamond. It is the first model in the Max tier of the Qwen line for which the team states weights will be released publicly, alongside a smaller Qwen3.8 27B checkpoint. No training or safety model card has been published.