Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.5 122B A10B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 122B A10B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is a high-capacity multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. The architecture contains 122 billion total parameters while activating roughly 10 billion per token through sparse expert routing, allowing the model to balance large-scale reasoning ability with relatively efficient inference compared to dense models of similar size.

The model is designed to process both text and visual inputs within a unified multimodal framework, enabling tasks that require reasoning across images, documents, charts, and natural language. This makes it suitable for applications such as document understanding, diagram interpretation, and complex visual question answering.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports a native context window of approximately 256,000 tokens, which can be extended further through techniques such as YaRN scaling to support very long-context workloads. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it builds on earlier Qwen multimodal systems and provides developers with an open-weight model capable of handling demanding multimodal reasoning and analysis tasks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.5 122B A10B
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters122B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50$0.260
Output $/1M$9.00$2.08
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Vision Language
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
79.1%
76.12%
Avg Response Time6.71s1.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K1.2K
Median output tokens2947
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0043$0.0003
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
60%(6/10)
40%(4/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
73.7%(14/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology