Gemini 3.5 Flash vs CLIP

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and CLIP side-by-side.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs CLIP live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs CLIP: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

CLIP

OpenAI CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) is a vision-language model released in January 2021 by OpenAI. It jointly trains an image encoder and a text encoder to produce matching embeddings for image-caption pairs, using a contrastive objective over WebImageText (WIT), a dataset of 400 million image-text pairs collected from the public web. By learning to associate images with free-form text rather than a fixed set of class labels, CLIP produces a shared embedding space that enables zero-shot classification with arbitrary vocabularies at inference time.

CLIP supports zero-shot image classification by embedding candidate class labels as text and selecting the label whose embedding is closest to a given image's embedding. It is also widely used for image-text retrieval, as a frozen backbone in downstream vision-language models, and as a building block for content moderation, similarity search, and generative model guidance — notably as the text conditioning mechanism in early versions of Stable Diffusion. OpenAI released several CLIP variants built on different vision encoders, including ResNet and Vision Transformer backbones at multiple sizes and input resolutions, with ViT-L/14 at 336 pixels being the largest and most widely adopted. CLIP is distributed under the MIT license. The model has been widely influential as the basis for subsequent vision-language work — including SigLIP, OpenCLIP, and MetaCLIP — and remains a common reference baseline despite being released in 2021 and surpassed on many benchmarks by later models.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs CLIP Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashCLIP
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Feb 2021
Context Window1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50
Output $/1M$9.00
Vision Tasks
ClassificationDemo
captioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
Document Question Answering
Image Embedding
Image Similarity
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Zero-shot Detection
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
79.1%
Avg Response Time6.71s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens294
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0043
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
60%(6/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology