Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 4

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Mistral Large 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 4 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.
MistralMistral Large 4
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 4 on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on all five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 82.1% to 38.9%.

Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash averages 81.8% (#4 of 63) against 56.8% (#41 of 63) for Mistral Large 4.

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper ($0.0033 vs $0.012 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster (11.5s vs 31.2s per sample).

Gemini 3.5 FlashMistral Large 4

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 4 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 19, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashMistral Large 4
OrganizationGoogleMistral
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Oct 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknown1.05T total, 49B active
LicenseProprietaryCustom
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsSee license terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50$0.680
Output $/1M$9.00$2.09
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Phrase GroundingNot listedSupported
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
81.8%
56.8%
Avg cost / sample$0.012$0.0033
Avg speed / sample11.52s31.23s
By task
Object Detection (low)
70.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 68.7 to 72.6
$0.016
59.3%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 58.5 to 60.0
$0.0028
Object Detection (high)
69.8%
±1.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.5 to 71.1
$0.021
50.2%
±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.0 to 53.0
$0.023
Counting (low)
80.6%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 81.1
$0.0075
54.5%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 55.4
$0.0010
Counting (high)
82.4%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 82.4
$0.017
63.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 64.9
$0.0094
Identification (low)
99.0%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
$0.0040
85.4%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5
$0.0009
Identification (high)
97.9%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
$0.0068
85.4%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5
$0.0044
OCR (low)
76.7%
$0.013
46.1%
$0.0044
by category
Single value
71.7%
Transcription
90.0%
Structured JSON
86.8%
Text localization
56.2%
Single value
33.5%
Transcription
68.9%
Structured JSON
71.7%
Text localization
0.0%
OCR (high)
75.5%
$0.031
54.5%
$0.021
by category
Single value
69.6%
Transcription
85.4%
Structured JSON
88.1%
Text localization
53.3%
Single value
38.3%
Transcription
75.3%
Structured JSON
76.4%
Text localization
28.8%
Reasoning (low)
82.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 84.1
$0.0082
38.9%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 38.4 to 39.1
$0.0013
Reasoning (high)
81.0%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.5 to 82.8
$0.018
57.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 59.6
$0.013

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 4: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4, nicknamed Le Chonk, is a natively multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Mistral that accepts interleaved text and image input and produces text output. It uses a granular MoE design with roughly 1.05 trillion total parameters and 49 billion active per token, reported as 52 billion when embeddings and output layers are counted, paired with a 1.6 billion parameter vision encoder and a context window of one million tokens. The model is trained from scratch on about 3,800 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's European data centers and supports more than 160 languages. It behaves as a hybrid instruct and reasoning system, with a reasoning effort setting that selects between direct answers and longer deliberation, alongside function calling and structured output for agentic workflows.

Image understanding is a focus of this generation, covering documents, charts, technical drawings and natural scenes, and the model emits bounding box coordinates for visual grounding queries. Reported grounding results include 42 percent on Dense200 and 73 percent on the DIOR-RSVG remote sensing benchmark. Mistral describes agentic vision workflows in which the model zooms into gigapixel satellite imagery or engineering drawings to verify details, and reports coding results such as 62 percent on DeepSWE. Figures published at preview time are preliminary because the reinforcement learning phase is still in progress.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.5 Flash performed better. It scores higher on all five vision tasks and averages 81.8% (#4 of 63) against 56.8% (#41 of 63) for Mistral Large 4. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Gemini 3.5 Flash leads with 82.1% against 38.9%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0033 per sample against $0.012. Gemini 3.5 Flash is priced at $1.50 per 1M input tokens and $9.00 per 1M output; Mistral Large 4 is priced at $0.68 per 1M input tokens and $2.09 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 11.5s per inference against 31.2s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and image captioning in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.