Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark Open
Muse Spark Open and Mistral Large 4 score 69.4% vs 56.8% averaged across five Vision Evals tasks (#25 and #43 of 65 models), so Muse Spark Open leads overall.
- Muse Spark Open wins 3 of the 5 tasks, with its widest lead on reasoning (63.8% vs 38.9%).
- Muse Spark Open is cheaper: $0.0059 vs $0.0065 overall average cost per sample.
- Muse Spark Open is faster: 7.4s vs 31.2s per sample.
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Compare Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark Open live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark Open on Vision Evals
Roboflow Vision Evals. Full breakdown below.
Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark Open Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated October 27, 2026
| Property | Mistral Large 4 | Muse Spark Open |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Mistral | Meta |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 1.05T total, 49B active | 816B total / 42B active |
| License | Custom | Custom |
| Commercial use | See license terms | See license terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.36 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $4.18 | $4.25 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Supported |
| OCR | Demo | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Supported |
| Phrase Grounding | Supported | Not listed |
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 56.8% | 69.4% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0065 | $0.0059 |
| Avg speed / sample | 31.23s | 7.37s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 59.3% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 58.5 to 60.0 | 57.8% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 57.0 to 58.2 |
| Object Detection (high) | 50.2% ±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.0 to 53.0 | 60.9% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.3 to 61.9 |
| Counting (low) | 54.5% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 55.4 | 75.7% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.0 to 78.4 |
| Counting (high) | 63.1% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 64.9 | 75.2% ±4.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 79.7 |
| Identification (low) | 85.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 | 82.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | 85.4% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 | 80.2% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4 |
| OCR (low) | 46.1% | 67.6% |
| by category |
|
|
| OCR (high) | 54.5% | 68.6% |
| by category |
|
|
| Reasoning (low) | 38.9% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 38.4 to 39.1 | 63.8% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.9 to 64.9 |
| Reasoning (high) | 57.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 59.6 | 65.1% ±3.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 62.3 to 68.2 |
Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Spark Open: Overview
Mistral Large 4, nicknamed Le Chonk, is a natively multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Mistral that accepts interleaved text and image input and produces text output. It uses a granular MoE design with roughly 1.05 trillion total parameters and 49 billion active per token, reported as 52 billion when embeddings and output layers are counted, paired with a 1.6 billion parameter vision encoder and a context window of one million tokens. The model is trained from scratch on about 3,800 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's European data centers and supports more than 160 languages. It behaves as a hybrid instruct and reasoning system, with a reasoning effort setting that selects between direct answers and longer deliberation, alongside function calling and structured output for agentic workflows.
Image understanding is a focus of this generation, covering documents, charts, technical drawings and natural scenes, and the model emits bounding box coordinates for visual grounding queries. Reported grounding results include 42 percent on Dense200 and 73 percent on the DIOR-RSVG remote sensing benchmark. Mistral describes agentic vision workflows in which the model zooms into gigapixel satellite imagery or engineering drawings to verify details, and reports coding results such as 62 percent on DeepSWE. Figures published at preview time are preliminary because the reinforcement learning phase is still in progress.
Muse Spark Open is an open-weight multimodal model released by Meta on October 15, 2026. Its sparse mixture-of-experts architecture has 816 billion total parameters and activates 42 billion per token. It accepts text, images, audio and video, produces text, and supports a context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Meta provides BF16 and NVFP4 checkpoints for self-hosting, alongside access through hosted inference partners.
The model is designed for coding, tool use and multi-step reasoning over long tasks. Its visual inputs support workflows involving screenshots, documents and other image content. Vision Evals measures its text understanding, counting, identification, reasoning and object detection at Low and High effort. The published weights use the custom Muse Model License, with commercial use subject to its terms and the accompanying usage policy.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Spark Open performed better. It scores higher on 3 of the five vision tasks and averages 69.4% (#25 of 65) against 56.8% (#43 of 65) for Mistral Large 4. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Muse Spark Open leads with 63.8% against 38.9%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Muse Spark Open is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0059 per sample against $0.0065. Mistral Large 4 is priced at $1.36 per 1M input tokens and $4.18 per 1M output; Muse Spark Open is priced at $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $4.25 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
Muse Spark Open is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 7.4s per inference against 31.2s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.