Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and Kimi K3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Object Detection.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.
MoonshotAIKimi K3
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

MoonshotAI

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3 on Vision Evals

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 72.2% to 42.4%.

Overall, Gemini 3.1 Pro averages 83.1% (#3 of 25) against 66.5% (#17 of 25) for Kimi K3.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is both cheaper ($0.0093 vs $0.011 per sample) and faster (7.8s vs 12.7s per sample).

Gemini 3.1 ProKimi K3

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3 Comparison Table

Evals updated August 6, 2026Pricing updated August 11, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.1 ProKimi K3
OrganizationGoogleMoonshot AI
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters2.8T
LicenseProprietaryModified MIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$3.00
Output $/1M$12.00$15.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
83.1%
66.5%
Avg cost / sample$0.0093$0.011
Avg speed / sample7.81s12.71s
By task
Object Detection
67.4%
$0.010
51.9%
$0.020
Counting
71.6%
$0.0071
46.0%
$0.0046
Identification
100.0%
$0.0070
81.3%
$0.0041
OCR
92.6%
$0.0066
93.0%
$0.0094
Data Extraction
94.8%
$0.0063
84.5%
$0.0046
Reasoning (low)
72.2%
$0.012
42.4%
$0.0044
Reasoning (high)
74.8%
$0.021
74.2%
$0.037

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts large language model developed by Moonshot AI, with 2.8 trillion total parameters and a 1-million-token context window. The model activates 16 out of 896 experts per token using the Stable LatentMoE framework, and is built on two architectural innovations: Kimi Delta Attention (KDA), a hybrid linear attention mechanism that enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in long-context settings, and Attention Residuals (AttnRes), which selectively retrieves representations across model depth and delivers roughly 25% higher training efficiency. Together with refined training and data recipes, these structural advances yield approximately 2.5x better overall scaling efficiency compared to its predecessor Kimi K2. The model applies quantization-aware training from the supervised fine-tuning stage onward, using MXFP4 weights with MXFP8 activations for hardware compatibility. Thinking mode is always enabled at launch, with reasoning effort configurable via the reasoning_effort field.

Kimi K3 supports native visual understanding alongside text, accepting image inputs for tasks that combine software engineering and visual reasoning. It targets long-horizon coding, knowledge work, and agentic workflows, and ships in two variants: K3 Max for general chat and agent tasks, and K3 Swarm Max for large-scale parallel processing across many coordinated sub-agents. The model is compatible with the OpenAI SDK via an OpenAI-compatible API. Full model weights are scheduled for release by July 27, 2026 under a Modified MIT license, following the open-weight pattern established by the Kimi K2 model family. A technical report with full architecture, training, and evaluation details is expected to accompany the weights release.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3.1 Pro performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 83.1% (#3 of 25) against 66.5% (#17 of 25) for Kimi K3. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Gemini 3.1 Pro leads with 72.2% against 42.4%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0093 per sample against $0.011. Gemini 3.1 Pro is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $12.00 per 1M output; Kimi K3 is priced at $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 7.8s per inference against 12.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.