Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5 Mini

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and GPT-5 Mini side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5 Mini live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5 Mini
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5 Mini: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Google DeepMind in the Gemini 3 series, based on the Gemini 3 Pro architecture. It processes text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs within a 1 million token context window and produces text output up to 64K tokens. The model targets high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads and supports visual question answering, image and document data extraction, content moderation, classification, translation, automated speech recognition, and agentic data pipelines. It exposes configurable thinking levels of minimal, low, medium, and high, which set the depth of internal reasoning applied per request and let developers balance response quality against cost and latency.

On benchmarks reported at launch, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 86.9% on GPQA Diamond and 76.8% on the MMMU Pro multimodal benchmark, and reaches an Elo score of 1432 on the Arena.ai leaderboard. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, it produces a 2.5 times faster time to first answer token and a 45% increase in output speed relative to Gemini 2.5 Flash. It also shows improved instruction following, higher audio input quality for automated speech recognition tasks, and support for structured JSON output used in data extraction pipelines.

GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is a mid-tier variant of the GPT-5 family that balances cost, speed, and capability. It is multimodal, supporting both text and image inputs, and offers a substantial input context window of ~400,000 tokens with output lengths up to ~128,000 tokens. While less powerful than the full GPT-5, it inherits its safety tuning, instruction-following improvements, and multimodal reasoning, making it a practical choice for developers who need large context handling without the expense of premium models.

GPT-5 Mini is optimized for affordability while retaining strong reasoning performance. Benchmarks show it outperforming earlier models such as GPT-4o on many multimodal and medical VQA tasks, though it lags behind GPT-5 on the most complex problems. Ideal use cases include prototyping, scalable content generation, document analysis, and mid-range reasoning tasks where efficiency and context capacity matter more than top-tier accuracy.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5 Mini Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-5 Mini
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Aug 2025
Context Window1.0M400K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.250$0.250
Output $/1M$1.50$2.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
73.13%
Avg Response Time1.86s11.72s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K1.4K
Median output tokens6143
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0006
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)
89.5%(17/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.96%
76.86%
Avg Response Time1.32s4.63s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K105
Median output tokens10209
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0004
Focused Scene OCR
91.9%(91/99)
72.7%(72/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
90%(27/30)
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)
78.3%(47/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology