Roboflow

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 31B

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Gemma 4 31B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 31B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 4 31B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 31B: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Google DeepMind in the Gemini 3 series, based on the Gemini 3 Pro architecture. It processes text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs within a 1 million token context window and produces text output up to 64K tokens. The model targets high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads and supports visual question answering, image and document data extraction, content moderation, classification, translation, automated speech recognition, and agentic data pipelines. It exposes configurable thinking levels of minimal, low, medium, and high, which set the depth of internal reasoning applied per request and let developers balance response quality against cost and latency.

On benchmarks reported at launch, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 86.9% on GPQA Diamond and 76.8% on the MMMU Pro multimodal benchmark, and reaches an Elo score of 1432 on the Arena.ai leaderboard. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, it produces a 2.5 times faster time to first answer token and a 45% increase in output speed relative to Gemini 2.5 Flash. It also shows improved instruction following, higher audio input quality for automated speech recognition tasks, and support for structured JSON output used in data extraction pipelines.

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B is the largest dense model in Google's Gemma 4 family, built from the same research as Gemini 3 and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license. It supports a 256K token context window with text and image input, configurable thinking mode for step-by-step reasoning, and multilingual support across 140+ languages. The unquantized model fits on a single 80GB GPU.

For vision tasks, Gemma 4 31B supports image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and can output structured bounding boxes for UI element detection, making it useful for document parsing and UI understanding. Compared to Gemma 3, it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance. It is part of a four-size family alongside the 26B A4B MoE variant and two on-device models (E2B, E4B), with the 31B dense variant optimized for output quality and fine-tuning over inference speed.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 31B Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGemma 4 31B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Apr 2026
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters31B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.250$0.120
Output $/1M$1.50$0.350
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
68.66%
67.16%
Avg Response Time1.86s34.59s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K294
Median output tokens6169
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0001
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
89.96%
84.72%
Avg Response Time1.32s11.82s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K290
Median output tokens10131
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
91.9%(91/99)
86.9%(86/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
90%(27/30)
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
83.3%(50/60)
85%(51/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology