Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and GLM-OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M
Parameters0.9B
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25
Output $/1M$10.00
Vision Tasks
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
Avg Response Time11.87s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens565
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0060
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
78.6%(11/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
78.6%
87.34%
Avg Response Time4.91s1.00s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290
Median output tokens323
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0036
Focused Scene OCR
78.8%(78/99)
87.9%(87/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
75%(45/60)
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology