Roboflow

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.8 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Object Detection, OCR, Open Prompt, and Classification.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.8 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.8 Flash
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2025Sep 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.100$0.825
Output $/1M$0.400$4.13
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
79.8%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0045
Avg speed / sample–12.76s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
68.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.3 to 69.0
$0.0045
Object Detection (high)–
74.8%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.4 to 75.6
$0.023
Counting (low)–
78.8%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 81.1
$0.0040
Counting (high)–
79.3%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.027
Identification (low)–
97.9%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
$0.0016
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0037
OCR (low)–
72.8%
$0.0049
by category
Single value
73.5%
Transcription
91.3%
Structured JSON
86.1%
Text localization
26.4%
OCR (high)–
78.7%
$0.039
by category
Single value
70.9%
Transcription
94.1%
Structured JSON
90.9%
Text localization
58.6%
Reasoning (low)–
81.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.8 to 81.5
$0.0038
Reasoning (high)–
84.5%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.4 to 85.4
$0.023

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, released for general availability on July 22, 2025, is the most cost-efficient model in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed for high-volume and latency-sensitive tasks. It is multimodal, supporting text, images, video, audio, and PDFs as inputs, with text as its primary output. The model handles up to 1 million input tokens and generates outputs up to 64K tokens, making it suitable for large-scale document or media processing at low cost. It is built on a Sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with native multimodal support, though exact parameter counts are undisclosed.

Flash-Lite offers the lowest usage cost among Gemini 2.5 models. It introduces developer controls for “thinking mode,” allowing fine-tuning of reasoning depth vs. efficiency. It also integrates native tools such as code execution, search grounding, and URL context. While strong on translation, classification, coding, and general multimodal reasoning, it lacks support for image or audio generation in its stable release and is less capable than Gemini 2.5 Flash or Pro on complex reasoning-heavy workflows.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash is a natively multimodal reasoning model in Google's Gemini 3 series, positioned as the speed and cost oriented Flash tier while targeting long-horizon software engineering, autonomous agents, and enterprise workflows. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents in a single request and returns text, with an input limit of 1,048,576 tokens and an output limit of 65,536 tokens. Thinking is configurable at low, medium, and high levels, and the model supports function calling, code execution, structured outputs, context caching, search and Maps grounding, file search, and computer use in preview. Image generation, audio generation, and the Live API are not supported.

On vision oriented evaluations the model reports 86.2% on CharXiv Reasoning for chart and figure synthesis and 87.8% on LVBench for long video understanding in agentic mode, alongside 90.8% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 61.6% on SWE-Bench Pro for coding. Following Gemini API conventions, it can localize objects by emitting bounding boxes as [ymin, xmin, ymax, xmax] integers normalized to a 0 to 1000 range, which supports prompt driven detection and grounding in addition to captioning, document parsing, and visual question answering. The knowledge cutoff is March 2026, though coverage in some domains reflects the January 2025 cutoff shared across the Gemini 3 family.

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.