Florence-2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Compare Florence-2 and Gemini 3.5 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Object Detection.

Compare Florence-2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AzureFlorence-2
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Florence-2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: Overview

Florence-2

Florence-2, introduced by Microsoft Research at CVPR 2024, is an open-source vision-language foundation model designed to unify diverse computer vision tasks within a single sequence-to-sequence framework. Unlike traditional models that specialize in specific tasks, Florence-2 accepts both images and text prompts and outputs text for tasks such as captioning, object detection, segmentation, OCR, and region-based grounding. It comes in two sizes—Florence-2-base (~230M parameters) and Florence-2-large (~770M parameters)—and is trained on FLD-5B, a large dataset of ~126M images with ~5.4B annotations.

The model demonstrates strong zero-shot and fine-tuned performance, often rivaling larger vision-language systems while remaining lightweight and efficient. Released under the MIT license, all weights are publicly available, making it accessible for fine-tuning and deployment in applications like VQA, content tagging, accessibility, and research. Florence-2’s compact design, versatility, and openness position it as a practical alternative to larger proprietary multimodal models.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Florence-2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Comparison Table

PropertyFlorence-2Gemini 3.5 Flash
OrganizationMicrosoftGoogle
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025May 2026
Context Window1.0M
Parameters230M
LicenseMITProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50
Output $/1M$9.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Instance Segmentation
Multi-Label Classification
Open Vocabulary Object Detection
Phrase Grounding
Region Proposal
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Zero-shot Detection
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
79.1%
Avg Response Time6.71s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens294
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0043
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
60%(6/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology