Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Muse Glimmer 30B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B on Vision Evals

Muse Glimmer 30B scores higher on 4 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 57.6% to 43.0%.

Overall, Claude Sonnet 5 averages 55.3% (#47 of 63) against 61.4% (#34 of 63) for Muse Glimmer 30B.

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper ($0.0013 vs $0.0074 per sample), while Claude Sonnet 5 is faster (5.9s vs 10.6s per sample).

Claude Sonnet 5Muse Glimmer 30B

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 13, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Muse Glimmer 30B
OrganizationAnthropicMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Aug 2026
Context Window1.0M131K
ParametersUnknown29.6B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.300
Output $/1M$10.00$1.20
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
55.3%
61.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0074$0.0013
Avg speed / sample5.86s10.60s
By task
Object Detection
36.1%
$0.011
41.0%
$0.0017
Counting
56.8%
$0.0030
66.2%
$0.0007
Identification
81.3%
$0.0027
81.3%
$0.0005
OCR (low)
59.4%
$0.0078
60.7%
$0.0013
by category
Single value
52.2%
Transcription
88.6%
Structured JSON
78.3%
Text localization
13.1%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
82.9%
Structured JSON
80.2%
Text localization
14.8%
OCR (high)
59.5%
$0.015
60.1%
$0.0033
by category
Single value
54.8%
Transcription
88.3%
Structured JSON
76.6%
Text localization
11.6%
Single value
54.4%
Transcription
78.4%
Structured JSON
80.0%
Text localization
13.7%
Reasoning (low)
43.0%
$0.0032
57.6%
$0.0009
Reasoning (high)
43.0%
$0.0043
62.9%
$0.0026

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Muse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense vision language model from Meta built for long-horizon agentic work on local hardware. The architecture pairs a 52-layer causal text decoder with a roughly 1.8B parameter ViT-G/14 perception encoder for about 29.6 billion parameters in total, and it accepts interleaved text and image input so an agent can interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation. The decoder uses grouped-query attention with 32 query heads and 2 key-value heads, a repeating pattern of three sliding-window local attention layers followed by one global layer, SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and rotary position embeddings applied on the local layers, supporting a trained context of 131,072 tokens.

Meta describes the model as distilled from the larger Muse Spark and trained and evaluated around agentic behavior: end-to-end task completion, schema-accurate tool calling, multi-step reasoning across extended workflows, and recovery when a tool call returns an unexpected result. Reasoning effort is selectable across low, medium, high, and xhigh settings, and the model emits channel-scoped reasoning traces together with XML style tool calls rather than JSON, which requires parsers specific to this family. A companion block-diffusion drafter head predicts blocks of 16 tokens per forward pass for speculative decoding, with the main model verifying the proposals in parallel.