Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s production-ready, efficiency-focused model in the Gemini 2.5 family. It is multimodal, accepting text, images, video, and audio as inputs, with text as the primary output format. The model supports 1 million input tokens and up to 65K output tokens, enabling it to process very large contexts such as books, long video transcripts, or extensive datasets. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Designed as a price-performance leader, Gemini 2.5 Flash balances speed and reasoning power, making it suitable for everyday enterprise and developer use cases without the higher latency and cost of Pro models. It supports advanced workflows like function calling, code execution, search grounding, URL context ingestion, and structured outputs. While efficient and scalable, output length is still limited compared to its input capacity, and multimodal outputs (e.g. image or audio generation) remain restricted to specialized or preview variants.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Gemini 2.5 Flash
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Jul 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.300
Output $/1M$10.00$2.50
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
55.22%
Avg Response Time3.90s24.91s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.1K294
Median output tokens61171
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0048$0.0005
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
79.04%
Avg Response Time2.77s2.39s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens642290
Median output tokens6481
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0019$0.0003
Focused Scene OCR
88.9%(88/99)
79.8%(79/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
80%(48/60)
71.7%(43/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology