Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3.7 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Classification, Open Prompt, Object Detection, and OCR.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 16, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Aug 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknownUndisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$3.00$0.750
Output $/1M$15.00$3.75
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
80.1%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0033
Avg speed / sample–11.04s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
70.5%
±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.4 to 71.5
$0.0047
Object Detection (high)–
74.3%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.3 to 75.0
$0.0089
Counting (low)–
78.4%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 79.7
$0.0025
Counting (high)–
79.3%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 81.1
$0.0056
Identification (low)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0013
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0021
OCR (low)–
73.9%
$0.0032
by category
Single value
74.8%
Transcription
91.1%
Structured JSON
86.7%
Text localization
29.4%
OCR (high)–
78.8%
$0.010
by category
Single value
71.7%
Transcription
91.9%
Structured JSON
90.6%
Text localization
59.2%
Reasoning (low)–
80.8%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.8 to 82.8
$0.0022
Reasoning (high)–
81.9%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 82.8
$0.0050

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier large language model, released February 17, 2026, designed to balance performance, cost, and versatility for professional and developer use. It supports text and vision-based tasks with advanced reasoning, agentic capabilities, and Adaptive Thinking — a mode where the model dynamically scales its internal reasoning depth. A beta context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens (200K standard) enables processing of entire codebases or document collections in a single request. Parameters are undisclosed.

Optimized for coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and knowledge work, Sonnet 4.6 delivers a full generational upgrade over Sonnet 4.5 and approaches Opus 4.5-level performance across many benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. It is the default model on Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and is available via API and major cloud platforms — making it well suited for production workloads requiring strong reasoning without flagship pricing.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is a proprietary multimodal model from Google, positioned in the Flash branch of the Gemini 3 series that trades some of the capacity of the larger Pro models for lower latency and lower cost per token. It accepts interleaved text and image input alongside other modalities handled by the Gemini family and returns text, and it continues the series pattern of exposing a configurable thinking budget so that reasoning effort can be scaled up for harder problems or reduced for high throughput extraction, routing and classification work. The model is announced roughly three weeks after Gemini 3.6 Flash, part of an unusually fast iteration cadence within the Flash line.

Google reports gains concentrated in agentic coding and front end generation, citing a WebDev Arena Elo of 1588 for this release compared with 1538 for the preceding Flash model, and describes it as producing more functional layouts and more feature complete applications in fewer prompts. Weights are not published and the architecture, parameter count and training corpus are undisclosed, consistent with prior Gemini releases. Visual capability follows the Flash lineage, covering image and document understanding, chart and diagram interpretation, text recognition in images, and general visual question answering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.