Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Nano

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5 Nano side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Classification, OCR, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Nano live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5 Nano
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Nano: Overview

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 is a proprietary multimodal language model developed by Anthropic, released on April 16, 2026. It is designed for agentic coding, long-horizon task execution, and enterprise knowledge work. The model supports text and vision inputs and operates with a context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens. It introduces adaptive thinking, which dynamically allocates reasoning based on task complexity, along with configurable effort controls including a new xhigh setting that sits between the existing high and max levels. It achieves 87.6% on SWE-bench Verified and 78.0% on OSWorld-Verified, reflecting strong performance on autonomous software engineering and computer use tasks respectively.

Compared to Claude Opus 4.6, version 4.7 shows improved instruction following and higher reliability in extended agentic tasks. Vision capabilities now support high-resolution inputs up to 2,576px on the long edge (~3.75 megapixels), more than three times the resolution of prior Claude models, enabling finer interpretation of dense diagrams, UI screenshots, and document layouts. These improvements, combined with self-verification on long-running tasks and a new task budget system for controlling agentic loops, make it well-suited for complex software engineering, technical analysis, and multimodal vision workflows.

GPT-5 Nano

GPT-5 Nano, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient model in the GPT-5 family. Like its larger counterparts, it is multimodal—accepting text and images, supporting tool use, structured outputs, and reasoning—but it is optimized for speed, low latency, and affordability. It features input and output token limits of roughly 272K and 128K tokens respectively, enabling large-context processing even at its compact scale. Its knowledge cutoff is around May 2024, slightly earlier than the full GPT-5 model.

GPT-5 Nano is well-suited for high-volume or cost-sensitive deployments such as mobile apps, embedded AI systems, or rapid-response APIs. While it offers less depth on complex reasoning and coding tasks compared to GPT-5 Mini or Pro, it retains core multimodal and agentic capabilities, making it an attractive option where efficiency and scale matter more than maximum performance.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Nano Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Opus 4.7GPT-5 Nano
OrganizationAnthropicOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Aug 2025
Context Window1.0M400K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$5.00$0.050
Output $/1M$25.00$0.400
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
67.16%
58.21%
Avg Response Time4.85s6.58s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.4K1.8K
Median output tokens110591
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.015$0.0003
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
86.9%
69%
Avg Response Time4.19s6.15s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens969122
Median output tokens81539
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0069$0.0002
Focused Scene OCR
88.9%(88/99)
64.6%(64/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
40%(4/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
83.3%(25/30)
Text Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
81.7%(49/60)
73.3%(44/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology