Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Mistral Medium 3.1 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6
Run to compare this model.
MistralMistral Medium 3.1
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Overview

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is the flagship large language model from Anthropic, released on 2026-02-05 for advanced reasoning, complex coding, and enterprise agent workflows. It supports text and image inputs via API, offers a 200K-token standard context window with a 1M-token beta option, and enables outputs up to 128K tokens, with adaptive reasoning and context compaction for sustained tasks.

As of 2026-02-17, Anthropic also released Claude Sonnet 4.6, extending the 1M-token context window to a broader tier. Opus remains positioned for maximum depth and benchmark performance, while Sonnet 4.6 brings long-context capability to more cost- and latency-sensitive production use cases.

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1, released in August 2025 as the mistral-medium-2508 update, is a proprietary frontier model from Mistral AI positioned between smaller open models and high-end closed LLMs. It is multimodal, handling both text and image inputs, with a context window of ~128K tokens.

Compared to Mistral Medium 3.0, the 3.1 release introduces improvements in reasoning, coding, STEM, and enterprise workflows, along with better tone control for conversational and business applications. It is designed for scalable enterprise deployments, including hybrid cloud and on-premises VPC setups. As part of Mistral’s Premier line, Medium 3.1 is a commercial-only offering: while it delivers strong accuracy and performance, trade-offs include higher costs than open-weight models, restricted fine-tuning access, and increased latency/cost for very large contexts.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6 Mistral Medium 3.1
OrganizationAnthropicMistral
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Aug 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$5.00$0.400
Output $/1M$25.00$2.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
64.18%
Avg Response Time23.35s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K
Median output tokens130
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.014
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology