Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
MiMo V2.6 Pro: 50.3% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#56 of 65 models). We have not run Claude Opus 4.6 through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score. Run both on your own image below.
Compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 7, 2026
| Property | Claude Opus 4.6 | MiMo V2.6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | Unknown | 1.02T total, 42B active |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | free for commercial use |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | $0.435 |
| Output $/1M | $25.00 | $0.870 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 50.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0011 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 9.45s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 42.0% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 40.9 to 43.1 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 46.7% ±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.7 to 47.3 |
| Counting (low) | – | 50.0% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.6 to 52.7 |
| Counting (high) | – | 59.0% ±5.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 52.7 to 63.5 |
| Identification (low) | – | 76.0% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.0 to 78.1 |
| Identification (high) | – | 78.1% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.9 to 81.3 |
| OCR (low) | – | 48.6% |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | – | 49.9% |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 35.1% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 32.5 to 37.8 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 55.9% ±2.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.3 to 58.9 |
Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro: Overview
Claude Opus 4.6 is the flagship large language model from Anthropic, released on 2026-02-05 for advanced reasoning, complex coding, and enterprise agent workflows. It supports text and image inputs via API, offers a 200K-token standard context window with a 1M-token beta option, and enables outputs up to 128K tokens, with adaptive reasoning and context compaction for sustained tasks.
As of 2026-02-17, Anthropic also released Claude Sonnet 4.6, extending the 1M-token context window to a broader tier. Opus remains positioned for maximum depth and benchmark performance, while Sonnet 4.6 brings long-context capability to more cost- and latency-sensitive production use cases.
MiMo V2.6 Pro is the flagship omni-modal foundation model in Xiaomi's MiMo V2.6 series, released as open weights alongside a Flash variant and a 9B distillation of Qwen3.5. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts transformer with 1.02 trillion total parameters and roughly 42 billion activated per token, paired with a hybrid attention design that interleaves sliding-window and global attention layers to support a context window of about one million tokens. Dedicated encoders handle non-text inputs, including a vision encoder of roughly 681 million parameters and an audio tokenizer stack, so the model accepts text, images, video, and audio and returns text.
Post-training centers on large-scale reinforcement learning across thousands of interactive environments, combined with agentic grading, self-correction cold start, and a multi-prefix multi-teacher on-policy distillation stage that extends behavior to tasks that are hard to verify automatically.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claude Opus 4.6 is released under Proprietary, while MiMo V2.6 Pro uses MIT. In practice: Claude Opus 4.6 : commercial use per vendor terms; MiMo V2.6 Pro: free for commercial use. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.