Roboflow

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, Object Detection, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6
Run to compare this model.
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5: Overview

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is the flagship large language model from Anthropic, released on 2026-02-05 for advanced reasoning, complex coding, and enterprise agent workflows. It supports text and image inputs via API, offers a 200K-token standard context window with a 1M-token beta option, and enables outputs up to 128K tokens, with adaptive reasoning and context compaction for sustained tasks.

As of 2026-02-17, Anthropic also released Claude Sonnet 4.6, extending the 1M-token context window to a broader tier. Opus remains positioned for maximum depth and benchmark performance, while Sonnet 4.6 brings long-context capability to more cost- and latency-sensitive production use cases.

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6 Claude Sonnet 5
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Jun 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$5.00$2.00
Output $/1M$25.00$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
64.18%
70.15%
Avg Response Time23.35s3.90s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K2.1K
Median output tokens13061
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.014$0.0048
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
82.53%
83.84%
Avg Response Time5.05s2.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens736642
Median output tokens9964
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0062$0.0019
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
88.9%(88/99)
Handwritten Math
70%(7/10)
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
76.7%(46/60)
80%(48/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology