Roboflow

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano

Claude Haiku 5.5: 69.6% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#23 of 65 models). GPT-4.1 nano is deprecated and was not run through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-4.1 nano

GPT-4.1 nano is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 3, 2026

PropertyClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4.1 nano
OrganizationAnthropicOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2026Apr 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersundisclosedUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.100$0.100
Output $/1M$0.500$0.400
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Object DetectionDemoSupported
OCRDemoSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoSupported
Both support 5 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
69.6%
Deprecated
Avg cost / sample$0.0006–
Avg speed / sample11.01s–
By task
Object Detection (low)
65.8%
±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.1 to 66.2
$0.0006
–
Object Detection (high)
68.2%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.2 to 69.2
$0.0010
–
Counting (low)
68.9%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 74.3
$0.0003
–
Counting (high)
73.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 74.3
$0.0004
–
Identification (low)
83.3%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5
$0.0002
–
Identification (high)
86.5%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5
$0.0003
–
OCR (low)
61.2%
$0.0006
–
by category
Single value
44.8%
Transcription
93.0%
Structured JSON
82.2%
Text localization
32.0%
OCR (high)
65.3%
$0.0010
–
by category
Single value
46.5%
Transcription
94.7%
Structured JSON
85.3%
Text localization
45.8%
Reasoning (low)
68.9%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.9 to 70.9
$0.0004
–
Reasoning (high)
74.8%
±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 77.5
$0.0006
–

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano: Overview

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the smallest member of the Claude 5.5 family, released on October 7, 2026 after Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 1M token context window and up to 128K output tokens per request. It is the first Haiku-class model with an adjustable effort parameter: adaptive thinking is on by default and the model decides how much to reason, steered by effort levels from low to max with medium as the default. Its training data cutoff is June 2026. Pricing starts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens, which Anthropic reports is about 90% lower than Claude Haiku 4.5 for requests in that range.

Anthropic positions Haiku 5.5 for high-volume, latency-sensitive work such as classification, extraction, routing, summarization, and subagent tasks, and describes it as its fastest model to date at standard speed. It uses the same tokenizer as Claude Opus 4.7 and later models, so the same text counts as roughly 30% more tokens than on Haiku 4.5.

GPT-4.1 nano

GPT-4.1 nano, released by OpenAI in April 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient member of the GPT-4.1 family. It is multimodal, supporting both text and image inputs, and retains the family’s extended 1 million-token context window—allowing it to handle large documents or codebases despite its lightweight design. Its training knowledge extends to June 2024.

GPT-4.1 nano prioritizes speed and affordability over raw reasoning power. While less capable than GPT-4.1 and GPT-4.1 mini, it is well-suited for high-volume or latency-sensitive workloads such as classification, autocomplete, content moderation, and lightweight assistants. This makes it an attractive option for developers seeking scalable deployment where efficiency is more critical than deep reasoning.