Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano
Claude Haiku 5.5: 69.6% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#23 of 65 models). GPT-4.1 nano is deprecated and was not run through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
GPT-4.1 nano is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano Comparison Table
Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 3, 2026
| Property | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2026 | Apr 2025 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | undisclosed | Unknown |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Commercial use | commercial use per vendor terms | commercial use per vendor terms |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.500 | $0.400 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Supported |
| OCR | Demo | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Supported |
| Model Features | ||
Both support 3 more features | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 69.6% | Deprecated |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0006 | – |
| Avg speed / sample | 11.01s | – |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 65.8% ±0.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.1 to 66.2 | – |
| Object Detection (high) | 68.2% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.2 to 69.2 | – |
| Counting (low) | 68.9% ±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.9 to 74.3 | – |
| Counting (high) | 73.0% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.6 to 74.3 | – |
| Identification (low) | 83.3% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 | – |
| Identification (high) | 86.5% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 | – |
| OCR (low) | 61.2% | – |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | 65.3% | – |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 68.9% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.9 to 70.9 | – |
| Reasoning (high) | 74.8% ±2.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 72.2 to 77.5 | – |
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano: Overview
Claude Haiku 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the smallest member of the Claude 5.5 family, released on October 7, 2026 after Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5. It accepts text and image input and returns text, with a 1M token context window and up to 128K output tokens per request. It is the first Haiku-class model with an adjustable effort parameter: adaptive thinking is on by default and the model decides how much to reason, steered by effort levels from low to max with medium as the default. Its training data cutoff is June 2026. Pricing starts at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens, which Anthropic reports is about 90% lower than Claude Haiku 4.5 for requests in that range.
Anthropic positions Haiku 5.5 for high-volume, latency-sensitive work such as classification, extraction, routing, summarization, and subagent tasks, and describes it as its fastest model to date at standard speed. It uses the same tokenizer as Claude Opus 4.7 and later models, so the same text counts as roughly 30% more tokens than on Haiku 4.5.
GPT-4.1 nano, released by OpenAI in April 2025, is the smallest and most cost-efficient member of the GPT-4.1 family. It is multimodal, supporting both text and image inputs, and retains the family’s extended 1 million-token context window—allowing it to handle large documents or codebases despite its lightweight design. Its training knowledge extends to June 2024.
GPT-4.1 nano prioritizes speed and affordability over raw reasoning power. While less capable than GPT-4.1 and GPT-4.1 mini, it is well-suited for high-volume or latency-sensitive workloads such as classification, autocomplete, content moderation, and lightweight assistants. This makes it an attractive option for developers seeking scalable deployment where efficiency is more critical than deep reasoning.