Claude Fable 5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Compare Claude Fable 5 and Mistral Small 3.1 24B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Claude Fable 5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 can't be run right now. See its model page for details.

MistralMistral Small 3.1 24B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Overview

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's first generally available Mythos-class large language model, released on June 9, 2026. It is built for long-horizon, asynchronous, and agentic tasks that prior Claude generations could not sustain, including multi-day autonomous coding sessions, complex knowledge work, and document-heavy analysis. The model supports a 1 million token context window with up to 128,000 output tokens per request and uses adaptive thinking as its sole reasoning mode, where the effort level is adjustable but raw chain-of-thought is never returned. Vision capabilities allow the model to parse diagrams, charts, and tables embedded in files and PDFs, and to use visual feedback to evaluate its own coding outputs against design goals. On benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro, the model scores 80.3% compared to 69.2% for Claude Opus 4.8, and it leads on CursorBench 3.1 for autonomous coding workflows.

Claude Fable 5 shares the same underlying model weights as Claude Mythos 5, but is deployed with safety classifiers that automatically reroute queries in high-risk domains — including cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry — to Claude Opus 4.8. These classifiers trigger in fewer than 5% of sessions on average. As a designated Covered Model, all traffic is subject to mandatory 30-day data retention to support safety monitoring. The model is available via the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. Anthropic has not publicly disclosed parameter count, architecture details, or training data composition for this model.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B, released on March 17, 2025, is an open-weight multimodal model from Mistral AI, distributed under the Apache-2.0 license. With around 24B parameters and a 128K token context window, it is available in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) variants. The model introduces vision support alongside text, enabling tasks like multimodal reasoning, captioning, and image-based Q&A.

It is multilingual, supporting many languages, and is optimized for fast responses, function calling, structured dialogue, and long-context reasoning. Despite its size, the model can be run locally in quantized formats, fitting on machines with ~32GB RAM, making it accessible to developers outside large cloud setups. However, the output length is smaller than the 128K input window, meaning long generations may require chaining. In addition, using full vision features or the maximum context window significantly increases compute costs, and performance on highly complex reasoning or enterprise-scale tasks still trails larger proprietary frontier models.

Claude Fable 5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Fable 5Mistral Small 3.1 24B
OrganizationAnthropicMistral
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Mar 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
Parameters24B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$10.00$0.351
Output $/1M$50.00$0.555
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Chart Question Answering
classification
Document Question Answering
Object Detection
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
74.63%
Avg Response Time16.44s
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
100%(14/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)