Roboflow

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5

Compare Claude Fable 5 and Claude Sonnet 5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Classification, OCR, Open Prompt, and Object Detection.

Compare Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
Run to compare this model.
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 on Vision Evals

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Claude Fable 5 leads 87.0% to 56.5%.

Overall, Claude Fable 5 averages 79.6% (#3 of 16) against 65.6% (#13 of 16) for Claude Sonnet 5.

Claude Sonnet 5 is both cheaper ($0.0053 vs $0.029 per sample) and faster (4.0s vs 8.4s per sample).

Claude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Comparison Table

Evals updated July 10, 2026Pricing updated July 21, 2026

PropertyClaude Fable 5Claude Sonnet 5
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Jun 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$10.00$2.00
Output $/1M$50.00$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks
Overall
79.6%
65.6%
Object Detection
40.6%
18.0%
Counting
63.5%
56.8%
Identification
100.0%
81.3%
OCR
94.0%
91.7%
Data Extraction
92.8%
89.7%
Reasoning
87.0%
56.5%
Avg cost / sample$0.029$0.0053
Avg speed / sample8.4s4.0s

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5: Overview

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's first generally available Mythos-class large language model, released on June 9, 2026. It is built for long-horizon, asynchronous, and agentic tasks that prior Claude generations could not sustain, including multi-day autonomous coding sessions, complex knowledge work, and document-heavy analysis. The model supports a 1 million token context window with up to 128,000 output tokens per request and uses adaptive thinking as its sole reasoning mode, where the effort level is adjustable but raw chain-of-thought is never returned. Vision capabilities allow the model to parse diagrams, charts, and tables embedded in files and PDFs, and to use visual feedback to evaluate its own coding outputs against design goals. On benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Pro, the model scores 80.3% compared to 69.2% for Claude Opus 4.8, and it leads on CursorBench 3.1 for autonomous coding workflows.

Claude Fable 5 shares the same underlying model weights as Claude Mythos 5, but is deployed with safety classifiers that automatically reroute queries in high-risk domains — including cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry — to Claude Opus 4.8. These classifiers trigger in fewer than 5% of sessions on average. As a designated Covered Model, all traffic is subject to mandatory 30-day data retention to support safety monitoring. The model is available via the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. Anthropic has not publicly disclosed parameter count, architecture details, or training data composition for this model.

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Claude Fable 5 performed better. It scores higher on all six vision tasks and averages 79.6% (#3 of 16) against 65.6% (#13 of 16) for Claude Sonnet 5. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark, Claude Fable 5 leads with 87.0% against 56.5%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0053 per sample against $0.029. Claude Fable 5 is priced at $10.00 per 1M input tokens and $50.00 per 1M output; Claude Sonnet 5 is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Claude Sonnet 5 is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.0s per inference against 8.4s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.