Roboflow

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Compare Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.7 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Classification.

Compare Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

GoogleGemini 3.7 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated September 29, 2026Pricing updated September 29, 2026

PropertyClaude Opus 4Gemini 3.7 Flash
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2025Aug 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUndisclosed
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.750
Output $/1M$3.75
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallDeprecated
85.2%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0031
Avg speed / sample–16.50s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
71.0%
±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 69.8 to 71.6
$0.0047
Object Detection (high)–
74.4%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.6 to 75.0
$0.0089
Counting (low)–
78.4%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 79.7
$0.0025
Counting (high)–
79.3%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 77.0 to 81.1
$0.0056
Identification (low)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0013
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0021
OCR (low)–
88.2%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.9 to 90.0
$0.0027
OCR (high)–
89.0%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.3 to 89.9
$0.0093
Data Extraction (low)–
96.2%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 95.9 to 96.9
$0.0014
Data Extraction (high)–
95.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 95.9 to 95.9
$0.0023
Reasoning (low)–
80.8%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.8 to 82.8
$0.0022
Reasoning (high)–
81.9%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 82.8
$0.0050

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: Overview

Claude Opus 4

Claude 4 Opus, released by Anthropic in May 2025, is the flagship model of the Claude 4 family, built for complex, long-horizon reasoning and advanced coding workflows. It is multimodal, supporting text (including voice), images, and tool use, and operates as a hybrid reasoning model—able to deliver quick answers in fast mode or switch to extended thinking for deeper, multi-step problem solving. With a ~200,000-token context window and a training cutoff around March 2025, it is optimized for handling large documents, long conversations, and sophisticated agentic tasks.

Positioned at the high end of Anthropic’s offerings, Opus 4 achieves state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks like SWE-Bench (72.5%) and Terminal-Bench (43.2%). It is best suited for research, enterprise automation, and software development at scale. The model is classified at Anthropic’s ASL-3 safety level, denoting advanced oversight and safety features.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is a proprietary multimodal model from Google, positioned in the Flash branch of the Gemini 3 series that trades some of the capacity of the larger Pro models for lower latency and lower cost per token. It accepts interleaved text and image input alongside other modalities handled by the Gemini family and returns text, and it continues the series pattern of exposing a configurable thinking budget so that reasoning effort can be scaled up for harder problems or reduced for high throughput extraction, routing and classification work. The model is announced roughly three weeks after Gemini 3.6 Flash, part of an unusually fast iteration cadence within the Flash line.

Google reports gains concentrated in agentic coding and front end generation, citing a WebDev Arena Elo of 1588 for this release compared with 1538 for the preceding Flash model, and describes it as producing more functional layouts and more feature complete applications in fewer prompts. Weights are not published and the architecture, parameter count and training corpus are undisclosed, consistent with prior Gemini releases. Visual capability follows the Flash lineage, covering image and document understanding, chart and diagram interpretation, text recognition in images, and general visual question answering.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4 has been deprecated by its provider and can no longer be run, so it is not part of Roboflow's current Vision Evals. This page compares the models on specs, licensing, and pricing instead.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.