Roboflow

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Compare Claude Opus 4 and Claude Fable 5.1 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Classification.

Compare Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Fable 5.1 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Fable 5.1 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 17, 2026

PropertyClaude Opus 4Claude Fable 5.1
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2025Sep 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1MNo published price$10.00
Output $/1MNo published price$50.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationSupportedDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallDeprecated
74.7%
Avg cost / sample–$0.039
Avg speed / sample–8.35s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
61.4%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 61.0 to 62.0
$0.060
Object Detection (high)–
65.0%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.6 to 65.3
$0.078
Counting (low)–
69.4%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 66.2 to 71.6
$0.019
Counting (high)–
73.0%
±4.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.6 to 77.0
$0.023
Identification (low)–
97.9%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0
$0.013
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 100.0
$0.014
OCR (low)–
72.9%
$0.039
by category
Single value
64.3%
Transcription
84.7%
Structured JSON
89.2%
Text localization
46.5%
OCR (high)–
75.3%
$0.051
by category
Single value
69.1%
Transcription
95.2%
Structured JSON
89.5%
Text localization
43.4%
Reasoning (low)–
72.0%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 70.9 to 73.5
$0.019
Reasoning (high)–
73.1%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 71.5 to 75.5
$0.028

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Fable 5.1: Overview

Claude Opus 4

Claude 4 Opus, released by Anthropic in May 2025, is the flagship model of the Claude 4 family, built for complex, long-horizon reasoning and advanced coding workflows. It is multimodal, supporting text (including voice), images, and tool use, and operates as a hybrid reasoning model—able to deliver quick answers in fast mode or switch to extended thinking for deeper, multi-step problem solving. With a ~200,000-token context window and a training cutoff around March 2025, it is optimized for handling large documents, long conversations, and sophisticated agentic tasks.

Positioned at the high end of Anthropic’s offerings, Opus 4 achieves state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks like SWE-Bench (72.5%) and Terminal-Bench (43.2%). It is best suited for research, enterprise automation, and software development at scale. The model is classified at Anthropic’s ASL-3 safety level, denoting advanced oversight and safety features.

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 is a proprietary multimodal model from Anthropic in the Mythos-class tier of the Claude 5 family, positioned above Claude Opus for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. It accepts text and images as input and returns text, with a one million token context window and a maximum output of 128 thousand tokens. Adaptive thinking is always on, and an effort parameter controls how much reasoning the model applies to a given request. Anthropic reports a reliable knowledge and training data cutoff of June 2026. Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 share the same underlying model; the difference between them is the set of safety classifiers applied to dual-use cybersecurity and biology requests.

On the vision side, Anthropic documents improvements in reading dense charts, financial filings, and tables nested inside PDF documents, which extends the model toward document understanding, chart question answering, and spreadsheet and slide work. Reported evaluations cover agentic scientific research on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, agentic coding on Terminal-Bench 4.0, computer use on OSWorld 2.0, and multidisciplinary reasoning on Humanity's Last Exam. Model weights are not published.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4 has been deprecated by its provider and can no longer be run, so it is not part of Roboflow's current Vision Evals. This page compares the models on specs, licensing, and pricing instead.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.