Roboflow

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs docTR

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and docTR side-by-side.

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs docTR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs docTR: Overview

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.

docTR

docTR (Document Text Recognition) is an open-source OCR toolkit developed by Mindee, with its initial public release in March 2021 under the Apache 2.0 license. It provides end-to-end document text recognition through a two-stage pipeline consisting of text detection and text recognition, both implemented as deep learning models. docTR supports multiple detection architectures including DBNet and LinkNet, and recognition architectures including CRNN and SAR, with both TensorFlow and PyTorch backends available.

docTR is designed for reading text in document images including scanned PDFs, photographs of printed documents, and forms. It handles multilingual text recognition across standard Latin-script languages and is deployable through Roboflow Inference. It is suited for document digitization pipelines, automated form processing, and applications requiring accurate structured text extraction from document images.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs docTR Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Haiku 4.5docTR
OrganizationAnthropicMindee
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalvision
Release DateOct 2025Feb 2021
Context Window200K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00
Output $/1M$5.00
Vision Tasks
OCRDemo
CaptioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
Avg Response Time3.15s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K
Median output tokens174
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0030
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
61.57%
Avg Response Time2.13s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens735
Median output tokens101
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0012
Focused Scene OCR
61.6%(61/99)
Handwritten Math
20%(2/10)
License Plate Recognition
66.7%(20/30)
Text Recognition
63.3%(19/30)
VQA & Extraction
65%(39/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology