Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Compare Qwen3.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Comparison Table
Evals updated August 27, 2026Pricing updated September 1, 2026
| Property | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | Qwen |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 35B (3B active, MoE) | 125B total, 6B active (+51B N-gram embeddings) |
| License | Proprietary | Custom |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.188 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $1.13 | $0.470 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| object-detection | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 70.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0004 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 8.24s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | – | 58.5% $0.0007 |
| Counting | – | 59.5% $0.0002 |
| Identification | – | 90.6% $0.0001 |
| OCR | – | 88.9% $0.0003 |
| Data Extraction | – | 86.6% $0.0002 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 37.8% $0.0002 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 68.9% $0.0011 |
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Overview
Qwen3.6-Flash is the production API variant of the Qwen3.6 model series, developed by the Qwen team at Alibaba Group. It is built on the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B architecture, which combines a hybrid linear attention mechanism with sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) routing to achieve high-throughput inference with reduced latency. The model is natively multimodal, processing both text and images within a unified early-fusion architecture, and supports 201 languages and dialects. It operates in a hybrid thinking mode, capable of generating explicit chain-of-thought reasoning before producing a final response, with the option to disable thinking for direct output. A Thinking Preservation feature allows reasoning context to be retained across multi-turn conversations, which is particularly useful for iterative agentic workflows.
The model is trained with reinforcement learning scaled across large-scale agent environments and covers a broad range of tasks including agentic coding, frontend development, visual understanding, document processing, and tool use. Compared to the open-weight Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, the Flash API variant extends the default context window to 1 million tokens and includes built-in production features such as native function calling and official tool integrations. The underlying architecture achieves near-100% multimodal training efficiency relative to text-only training, and the model demonstrates strong performance on agentic coding benchmarks including SWE-bench Verified.
Qwen3.8-Flash is a multimodal mixture-of-experts model from the Qwen team at Alibaba, and the production counterpart of the open-weight Qwen3.8-Flash-Next preview that introduces the architecture intended for the Qwen4 family. The main model carries 125 billion parameters alongside a separate 51 billion parameter N-gram embedding table, while activating roughly 6 billion parameters per token. It accepts interleaved image and text input and returns text, handling 262,144 tokens of context natively with extension to 1,000,000 tokens using YaRN. The production configuration runs with the 1M context window by default and adds built-in tool support.
Four architectural changes separate it from earlier Qwen releases: hybrid attention that pairs Gated DeltaNet for history compression with Qwen Sparse Attention, which uses a lightweight indexer to select micro-blocks of context; a Gated Residual scheme; N-gram embeddings; and training with the Muon optimizer, refined around orthogonalization accuracy and the division of parameters between Muon and AdamW. Qwen reports training cost around one ninth that of Qwen3.7-Plus, with QSA attention kernels measured up to 7.6 times faster in prefill and 4.9 times faster in decode at 1M-token context. Reported scores include 58.7 on DeepSWE 1.1, 62.5 on SWE-bench Pro, 84.5 on AndroidWorld and 95.7 on MathVision.