Roboflow

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Compare Muse Wonder and Qwen3.5 35B A3B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
MetaMuse Wonder
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 35B A3B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B on Vision Evals

Muse Wonder scores higher on all 4 Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Reasoning, where Muse Wonder leads 85.2% to 54.1%.

Overall, Muse Wonder averages 78.8% (#8 of 62) against 62.5% (#31 of 62) for Qwen3.5 35B A3B.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper ($0.0016 vs $0.034 per sample), while Muse Wonder is faster (11.7s vs 31.9s per sample).

Muse WonderQwen3.5 35B A3B

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 13, 2026

PropertyMuse WonderQwen3.5 35B A3B
OrganizationMetaQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
Parametersundisclosed35B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$4.00$0.080
Output $/1M$20.00$0.750
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoSupported
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoSupported
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
78.8%
62.5%
4/5 tasks
Quantizationsself-hosted
FP859.8%GPTQ-INT462.5%hardware →
Avg cost / sample$0.034$0.0016
Avg speed / sample11.68s31.88s
By task
Object Detection (low)
65.1%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 64.5 to 66.0
$0.044
52.9%
±3.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 49.5 to 55.9
$0
Object Detection (high)
66.0%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.2 to 66.5
$0.061
–
Counting (low)
76.6%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.7 to 78.4
$0.024
62.6%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 64.9
$0
Counting (high)
79.7%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.043
–
Identification (low)
92.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.014
80.2%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 81.3
$0
Identification (high)
90.6%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 90.6
$0.023
–
OCR (low)
74.3%
$0.034
–
by category
Single value
67.4%
Transcription
93.2%
Structured JSON
90.5%
Text localization
40.1%
OCR (high)
76.0%
$0.059
–
by category
Single value
70.9%
Transcription
88.3%
Structured JSON
90.3%
Text localization
45.9%
Reasoning (low)
85.2%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.8 to 85.4
$0.024
54.1%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 53.6 to 54.3
$0
Reasoning (high)
83.4%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 84.1
$0.047
–

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Overview

Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta, released on October 12, 2026 as the first step past the Muse Spark line on Meta's scaling ladder. It launched together with Muse Wonder Full, a larger configuration that is available only through Muse Code subscription plans, while Muse Wonder itself is served through the Meta Model API under the identifier muse-wonder-1.0. The model accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents as input and returns text, with a context window of 1,048,576 tokens and graded reasoning effort settings. Meta trained both models at its Prometheus data center on larger base models than Muse Spark 1.3, and attributes their gains on unfamiliar tasks to post-training that transfers more effectively from a stronger base.

Meta positions Muse Wonder for long-running personal and professional agents: it plans multi-step work, delegates to sub-agents, calls tools in parallel, recovers from errors, and operates browsers and desktop or mobile applications. Two training objectives shape this behaviour. Active Memory carries goals, constraints, and earlier decisions across conversations and retrieves the details relevant to the current step, and Active Focus keeps the model trying alternative approaches when a task gets difficult while asking for clarification before important actions. Visual inputs such as screenshots, charts, and video feed the same reasoning loop, and the model emits bounding box coordinates for grounding queries. Meta's model card lists visual and spatial reasoning, especially 3D tasks, as a known limitation and recommends validating performance for applications that depend on precise spatial understanding.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B

The Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is a native vision-language model developed by Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen team, released on February 24, 2026, as a high-efficiency entry in the Qwen 3.5 family. It utilizes a sophisticated hybrid architecture that integrates Gated Delta Networks with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) system. While the model houses 35 billion total parameters, its routing mechanism activates only 8 routed experts and 1 shared expert per token, totaling approximately 3 billion active parameters. This design achieves cross-generational parity with the previous flagship Qwen3-235B dense model, delivering comparable reasoning and multimodal intelligence with significantly reduced inference latency and compute requirements. Available under the Apache 2.0 license, it is released in both base and instruction-tuned variants for seamless integration with open-source stacks like vLLM and Hugging Face Transformers.

Designed for the emerging era of agentic AI, the model utilizes a unified multimodal foundation built through early-fusion training. This approach allows it to outperform the prior Qwen3-VL series in spatial grounding, document analysis, and UI/GUI interaction. It features a native context window of 262,144 tokens, which is extensible up to 1,010,000 tokensvia RoPE scaling, and provides global support for 201 languages and dialects. This combination of a compact active parameter count and frontier-level visual comprehension makes it a versatile tool for developers requiring a balance of high-throughput speed and sophisticated visual reasoning for long-context workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Wonder performed better. It scores higher on all 4 vision tasks and averages 78.8% (#8 of 62) against 62.5% (#31 of 62) for Qwen3.5 35B A3B. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Muse Wonder leads with 85.2% against 54.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0016 per sample against $0.034. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Muse Wonder is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 11.7s per inference against 31.9s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for open prompts and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.