Roboflow

Muse Ember vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Muse Ember: 76.6% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#16 of 67 models). We have not run Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Compare Muse Ember vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Muse Ember vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Comparison Table

Evals updated November 10, 2026Pricing updated November 10, 2026

PropertyMuse EmberQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
OrganizationMetaQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateNov 2026Oct 2025
Context Window1.0M256K
ParametersUnknown8.8B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termsfree for commercial use
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.100$0.250
Output $/1M$0.500$0.750
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Both support 7 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
76.6%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.0009–
Avg speed / sample6.08s–
By task
Object Detection (low)
63.8%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.3 to 64.3
$0.0011
–
Object Detection (high)
64.0%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 63.5 to 64.5
$0.0017
–
Counting (low)
79.7%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 81.1
$0.0006
–
Counting (high)
79.3%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 79.7
$0.0011
–
Identification (low)
91.7%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 93.8
$0.0004
–
Identification (high)
90.6%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 93.8
$0.0007
–
OCR (low)
69.5%
$0.0010
–
by category
Single value
61.7%
Transcription
95.5%
Structured JSON
85.1%
Text localization
35.3%
OCR (high)
70.5%
$0.0017
–
by category
Single value
63.0%
Transcription
90.2%
Structured JSON
87.2%
Text localization
35.9%
Reasoning (low)
78.2%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.8 to 79.5
$0.0006
–
Reasoning (high)
81.9%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 83.4
$0.0013
–

Muse Ember vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct: Overview

Muse Ember

Muse Ember is a proprietary multimodal reasoning model from Meta, released on November 9, 2026. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text. The Meta Model API serves it as muse-ember-1.0, with a 1,048,576-token context window and up to 524,288 output tokens. Reasoning effort is adjustable from minimal to max.

Meta positions Ember for repeated tasks within larger agent workflows: tool calls, routing, coding subtasks, and processing collections of images and documents. It can caption or sort photos and extract fields from records while a larger Muse model handles planning. Meta recommends Spark or Wonder for harder single-shot coding and knowledge-heavy problems. Ember is available as a hosted model; its weights are not publicly released.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is an open-weight multimodal vision-language model developed by Qwen / Alibaba Cloud as part of the Qwen3-VL series, designed for instruction-following tasks that combine text with visual inputs such as images and video. Released around October 2025 under the Apache-2.0 license, it targets developers who need capable multimodal reasoning without the scale or cost of very large models.

The model contains roughly 8.8 billion dense parameters and supports text, image, and video understanding with strong spatial perception, visual reasoning, and emerging visual agent abilities such as GUI interaction. A standout feature is its native ~256K token context window, extendable to around 1M tokens, enabling long-document reading and extended video comprehension. In today’s landscape, it balances openness, long-context capacity, and solid multimodal performance against heavier proprietary models. Typical applications include multimodal assistants, document and video analysis, visual question answering, and research or product prototyping where transparency and deployability matter.