Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5 9b
Compare Mistral Large 4 and Qwen3.5 9b side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.
Compare Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5 9b live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5 9b on Vision Evals
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on 2 of the 4 Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where Mistral Large 4 leads 59.3% to 38.1%.
Overall, Mistral Large 4 averages 56.8% (#41 of 63) against 56.0% (#42 of 63) for Qwen3.5 9b.
Qwen3.5 9b is cheaper ($0.0021 vs $0.0033 per sample), while Mistral Large 4 is faster (31.2s vs 41.4s per sample).
Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5 9b Comparison Table
Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 18, 2026
| Property | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen3.5 9b |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Mistral | Qwen |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Oct 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Parameters | 1.05T total, 49B active | 9B |
| License | Custom | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | See license terms | free for commercial use |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.680 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $2.09 | $0.150 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Classification | Demo | Supported |
| Document Question Answering | Supported | Supported |
| Image Tagging | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-Label Classification | Supported | Supported |
| Object Detection | Demo | Supported |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | Supported | Supported |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Phrase Grounding | Supported | Not listed |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | Supported | Supported |
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | Supported | Supported |
| Multimodal Vision | Supported | Supported |
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 56.8% | 56.0% 4/5 tasks |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | $0.0033 | $0.0021 |
| Avg speed / sample | 31.23s | 41.36s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 59.3% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 58.5 to 60.0 | 38.1% ±5.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 33.5 to 44.9 |
| Object Detection (high) | 50.2% ±2.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 48.0 to 53.0 | – |
| Counting (low) | 54.5% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 55.4 | 56.8% ±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.4 to 58.1 |
| Counting (high) | 63.1% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 60.8 to 64.9 | – |
| Identification (low) | 85.4% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 87.5 | 83.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.3 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | 85.4% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 87.5 | – |
| OCR (low) | 46.1% | – |
| by category |
| |
| OCR (high) | 54.5% | – |
| by category |
| |
| Reasoning (low) | 38.9% ±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 38.4 to 39.1 | 45.9% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 44.4 to 47.7 |
| Reasoning (high) | 57.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 55.6 to 59.6 | – |
Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5 9b: Overview
Mistral Large 4, nicknamed Le Chonk, is a natively multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Mistral that accepts interleaved text and image input and produces text output. It uses a granular MoE design with roughly 1.05 trillion total parameters and 49 billion active per token, reported as 52 billion when embeddings and output layers are counted, paired with a 1.6 billion parameter vision encoder and a context window of one million tokens. The model is trained from scratch on about 3,800 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's European data centers and supports more than 160 languages. It behaves as a hybrid instruct and reasoning system, with a reasoning effort setting that selects between direct answers and longer deliberation, alongside function calling and structured output for agentic workflows.
Image understanding is a focus of this generation, covering documents, charts, technical drawings and natural scenes, and the model emits bounding box coordinates for visual grounding queries. Reported grounding results include 42 percent on Dense200 and 73 percent on the DIOR-RSVG remote sensing benchmark. Mistral describes agentic vision workflows in which the model zooms into gigapixel satellite imagery or engineering drawings to verify details, and reports coding results such as 62 percent on DeepSWE. Figures published at preview time are preliminary because the reinforcement learning phase is still in progress.
Qwen3.5-9B is a 9-billion-parameter multimodal foundation model developed by Alibaba Cloud's Qwen team, released on March 2, 2026 as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. Designed for efficient multimodal reasoning and long-context language tasks, it notably outperforms the older Qwen3-30B, a model more than three times its size, on key benchmarks including GPQA Diamond, IFEval, and LongBench.
The model supports vision-language inputs through an early-fusion multimodal architecture built on a dense hybrid foundation of Gated Delta Networks and Gated Attention. It can also operate in a text-only mode by skipping the vision encoder during inference. It provides a 262,144-token context window (extensible to ~1M tokens via YaRN) and is released under the Apache License 2.0. Within the current AI landscape, Qwen3.5-9B offers a strong balance of capability and efficiency, making it well-suited for multimodal assistants, document analysis, long-context reasoning, and developer-deployed agentic systems.