Roboflow

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Compare Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
MetaLlama 4 Maverick
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct: Overview

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick, introduced on April 5, 2025, is one of the first models in Meta’s Llama 4 family, designed as a natively multimodal model supporting text + image inputs with text outputs. It employs a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts, activating ~17B parameters per token out of a pool of ~400B total parameters. This design improves scalability, efficiency, and reasoning capacity. Maverick has a 1M-token context window, enabling it to handle large documents, extended conversations, and multimodal reasoning. Its knowledge cutoff is August 2024.

The model is released under the Llama 4 Community License and comes in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) versions. Maverick is widely deployed via Hugging Face, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock, and Oracle Cloud, making it one of the most accessible large open-weight models. However, it outputs text only (no image/audio generation) and, while input capacity is huge, output limits are typically much smaller. The MoE design also raises hardware demands, as maintaining 128 experts requires significant compute resources, and Meta’s license introduces restrictions around commercial-scale use.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct is an open-weight multimodal vision-language model developed by Qwen / Alibaba Cloud as part of the Qwen3-VL series, designed for instruction-following tasks that combine text with visual inputs such as images and video. Released around October 2025 under the Apache-2.0 license, it targets developers who need capable multimodal reasoning without the scale or cost of very large models.

The model contains roughly 8.8 billion dense parameters and supports text, image, and video understanding with strong spatial perception, visual reasoning, and emerging visual agent abilities such as GUI interaction. A standout feature is its native ~256K token context window, extendable to around 1M tokens, enabling long-document reading and extended video comprehension. In today’s landscape, it balances openness, long-context capacity, and solid multimodal performance against heavier proprietary models. Typical applications include multimodal assistants, document and video analysis, visual question answering, and research or product prototyping where transparency and deployability matter.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Comparison Table

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
OrganizationMetaQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2025Oct 2025
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters400B8.8B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.150$0.117
Output $/1M$0.600$0.455
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object Detection
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
59.7%
Avg Response Time2.30s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.4K
Median output tokens7
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0004
Defect Detection
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
63.2%(12/19)
OCR
Overall Score
78.6%
Avg Response Time0.87s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens472
Median output tokens10
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
76.8%(76/99)
Handwritten Math
60%(6/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
VQA & Extraction
75%(45/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology