Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Compare Kimi K3 and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, Image Captioning, OCR, and Classification.
Compare Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1 on Vision Evals
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on 5 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 74.8% to 42.4%.
Overall, Kimi K3 averages 66.5% (#20 of 30) against 79.3% (#7 of 30) for Muse Spark 1.1.
Muse Spark 1.1 is both cheaper ($0.0069 vs $0.011 per sample) and faster (11.4s vs 12.7s per sample).
Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Comparison Table
Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 14, 2026
| Property | Kimi K3 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Category | open | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jul 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 2.8T | |
| License | Modified MIT | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $3.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $15.00 | $4.25 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 66.5% | 79.3% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.011 | $0.0069 |
| Avg speed / sample | 12.71s | 11.40s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 51.9% $0.020 | 58.4% $0.010 |
| Counting | 46.0% $0.0046 | 75.7% $0.0043 |
| Identification | 81.3% $0.0041 | 87.5% $0.0032 |
| OCR | 93.0% $0.0094 | 92.5% $0.0063 |
| Data Extraction | 84.5% $0.0046 | 86.6% $0.0031 |
| Reasoning (low) | 42.4% $0.0044 | 74.8% $0.0065 |
| Reasoning (high) | 74.2% $0.037 | 76.2% $0.013 |
Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.1: Overview
Kimi K3 is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts large language model developed by Moonshot AI, with 2.8 trillion total parameters and a 1-million-token context window. The model activates 16 out of 896 experts per token using the Stable LatentMoE framework, and is built on two architectural innovations: Kimi Delta Attention (KDA), a hybrid linear attention mechanism that enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in long-context settings, and Attention Residuals (AttnRes), which selectively retrieves representations across model depth and delivers roughly 25% higher training efficiency. Together with refined training and data recipes, these structural advances yield approximately 2.5x better overall scaling efficiency compared to its predecessor Kimi K2. The model applies quantization-aware training from the supervised fine-tuning stage onward, using MXFP4 weights with MXFP8 activations for hardware compatibility. Thinking mode is always enabled at launch, with reasoning effort configurable via the reasoning_effort field.
Kimi K3 supports native visual understanding alongside text, accepting image inputs for tasks that combine software engineering and visual reasoning. It targets long-horizon coding, knowledge work, and agentic workflows, and ships in two variants: K3 Max for general chat and agent tasks, and K3 Swarm Max for large-scale parallel processing across many coordinated sub-agents. The model is compatible with the OpenAI SDK via an OpenAI-compatible API. Full model weights are scheduled for release by July 27, 2026 under a Modified MIT license, following the open-weight pattern established by the Kimi K2 model family. A technical report with full architecture, training, and evaluation details is expected to accompany the weights release.
Muse Spark 1.1 is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, released on July 9, 2026, as a significant upgrade to the original Muse Spark. The model accepts text, image, video, PDF, and audio as input and produces text output. It operates with a 1-million-token context window (1,048,576 tokens per the Meta Model API documentation) and is designed specifically for agentic tasks that require planning, tool use, computer use, and multi-agent orchestration. The model runs in a "Thinking" mode, where adjustable reasoning effort is applied before generating a response. It can function both as a main agent gathering context, forming plans, and delegating to parallel subagents and as a subagent that adheres to assigned tasks and escalates when needed. It is trained to decide autonomously when to write automation scripts versus interact directly with a user interface.
Muse Spark 1.1 supports a range of multimodal capabilities including visual perception, image and video captioning, visual-to-code generation, and document analysis. The model was evaluated under Meta's Advanced AI Scaling Framework across frontier risk categories including chemical and biological threats, cybersecurity, and loss-of-control scenarios. Parameter count, architecture details, and training data composition are not publicly disclosed. The model is proprietary and closed-weight, accessible to consumers through the Meta AI app and to developers via the Meta Model API, which launched in public preview alongside this release.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Muse Spark 1.1 performed better. It scores higher on 5 of the six vision tasks and averages 79.3% (#7 of 30) against 66.5% (#20 of 30) for Kimi K3. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Reasoning benchmark at low effort, Muse Spark 1.1 leads with 74.8% against 42.4%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0069 per sample against $0.011. Kimi K3 is priced at $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output; Muse Spark 1.1 is priced at $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $4.25 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
Muse Spark 1.1 is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 11.4s per inference against 12.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.