Roboflow

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Compare Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Plus side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Object Detection.

Compare Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GrokGrok 4.5
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.7 Plus
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus on Vision Evals

Grok 4.5 scores higher on 3 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 60.1% to 18.0%.

Overall, Grok 4.5 averages 64.3% (#25 of 31) against 67.4% (#18 of 31) for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Qwen3.7 Plus is both cheaper ($0.0008 vs $0.0077 per sample) and faster (7.0s vs 14.3s per sample).

Grok 4.5Qwen3.7 Plus

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Comparison Table

Evals updated August 20, 2026Pricing updated August 24, 2026

PropertyGrok 4.5Qwen3.7 Plus
OrganizationSpaceXAIQwen
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodal
Release DateJul 2026
Context Window500K
Parameters
LicenseProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.320
Output $/1M$6.00$1.28
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Vision Language
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
64.3%
67.4%
Avg cost / sample$0.0077$0.0008
Avg speed / sample14.33s7.01s
By task
Object Detection
18.0%
$0.0100
60.1%
$0.0013
Counting
55.4%
$0.0065
50.0%
$0.0004
Identification
78.1%
$0.0045
84.4%
$0.0003
OCR
92.5%
$0.0065
86.5%
$0.0009
Data Extraction
83.5%
$0.0044
83.5%
$0.0004
Reasoning (low)
58.3%
$0.0076
39.7%
$0.0003
Reasoning (high)
59.6%
$0.011
68.2%
$0.0043

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: Overview

Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 is a proprietary reasoning model from SpaceXAI (xAI) that accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, with a 500,000 token context window. xAI positions it as a model for coding, agentic software work, and knowledge tasks, and states it was trained in the company's Memphis data centers on datasets spanning science, engineering, and mathematics. Its reinforcement learning stage covers hundreds of thousands of multi step software engineering tasks scored by automated checks and model based grading, and training is reported to have run on tens of thousands of NVIDIA GB300 GPUs using an asynchronous scheme in which multi hour agentic rollouts continue while learning proceeds in parallel, targeting long horizon autonomous operation rather than single turn inference.

For vision, the model consumes JPEG and PNG images in any order relative to text prompts, covering visual question answering, description of chart and document imagery, and reading text rendered inside a scene. Reasoning effort is configurable, and the model supports function calling and structured outputs, so image inputs can be interleaved with tool calls inside agent loops. xAI has not published a technical report, architecture details, or parameter count, and reported mixture of experts sizing figures come from secondary coverage rather than official documentation.

Qwen3.7 Plus
No description available

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Grok 4.5 performed better. It scores higher on 3 of the six vision tasks and averages 64.3% (#25 of 31) against 67.4% (#18 of 31) for Qwen3.7 Plus. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Qwen3.7 Plus leads with 60.1% against 18.0%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0008 per sample against $0.0077. Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output; Qwen3.7 Plus is priced at $0.32 per 1M input tokens and $1.28 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Qwen3.7 Plus is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 7.0s per inference against 14.3s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.