Roboflow

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 397B A17B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the mid-tier reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes the flagship Sol and the lightweight Luna. Introduced in a limited preview on June 26, 2026, and made broadly available on July 9, 2026, Terra accepts text and image input and produces text output, supporting vision, function calling, tool use, and agentic workflows. It is designed as a balanced option for everyday professional and production workloads — including coding assistance, document analysis, customer support, and multi-step agent tasks — where both output quality and cost efficiency matter. OpenAI positions Terra as delivering performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at approximately half the price, with a context window of around 1,050,000 tokens. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Terra scores 84.3%, matching Claude Fable 5 on that benchmark. Under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework, Terra is rated High for cybersecurity and biological capabilities, meaning it demonstrates meaningful capability in those domains without reaching the Critical threshold.

GPT-5.6 introduces a new naming convention in which the generation number (5.6) is paired with a durable capability tier name (Sol, Terra, or Luna), allowing each tier to advance on its own schedule. Terra carries the API identifier gpt-5.6-terra and supports the same reasoning effort controls available across the family, including adjustable reasoning depth. The model includes prompt caching with explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life, with cache writes billed at 1.25x the uncached input rate and cache reads receiving a 90% discount. GPT-5.6 Terra is a proprietary, closed-weights model served through the OpenAI API, Codex, and ChatGPT.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.

As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.6 TerraQwen3.5 397B A17B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.1M262K
Parameters397B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.50$0.385
Output $/1M$15.00$2.45
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
classificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
Avg Response Time56.61s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens54
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0006
Defect Detection
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
68.56%
Avg Response Time7.45s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens122
Median output tokens20
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
57.6%(57/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
68.3%(41/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology