Roboflow

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Luna
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 397B A17B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Sol (the flagship tier) and Terra (the balanced mid-tier). Introduced under a new naming convention where the generation number (5.6) and a durable capability tier name (Luna, Terra, Sol) together define each model, Luna occupies the lightweight end of the family and is designed for high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads such as summarization, drafting, autocomplete, classification, and routine automation. The GPT-5.6 family as a whole advances capabilities in software engineering, computer use, professional knowledge work, scientific research, and cybersecurity, with all three tiers rated at the "High" capability level under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework for both cybersecurity and biological/chemical risk domains.

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal input and function calling, and shares the family's 1.5 million token context window. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Luna scores 82.5%, and on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index it outperforms comparable models at roughly one-quarter the estimated cost of higher-tier alternatives. Luna is priced at $1 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens, with cached input reads at $0.10 per million tokens under the GPT-5.6 prompt caching scheme, which introduces explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. The model was previewed on June 26, 2026 to a limited group of trusted partners via the OpenAI API and Codex, with general availability rolling out on July 9, 2026 across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.

As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.5 397B A17B
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.5M262K
Parameters397B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00$0.385
Output $/1M$6.00$2.45
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
Avg Response Time56.61s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens54
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0006
Defect Detection
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
68.56%
Avg Response Time7.45s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens122
Median output tokens20
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
57.6%(57/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
68.3%(41/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology