Roboflow

GLM-OCR vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Compare GLM-OCR and GPT-5.6 Terra side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare GLM-OCR vs GPT-5.6 Terra live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GLM-OCR vs GPT-5.6 Terra: Overview

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the mid-tier reasoning model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes the flagship Sol and the lightweight Luna. Introduced in a limited preview on June 26, 2026, and made broadly available on July 9, 2026, Terra accepts text and image input and produces text output, supporting vision, function calling, tool use, and agentic workflows. It is designed as a balanced option for everyday professional and production workloads — including coding assistance, document analysis, customer support, and multi-step agent tasks — where both output quality and cost efficiency matter. OpenAI positions Terra as delivering performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at approximately half the price, with a context window of around 1,050,000 tokens. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Terra scores 84.3%, matching Claude Fable 5 on that benchmark. Under OpenAI's Preparedness Framework, Terra is rated High for cybersecurity and biological capabilities, meaning it demonstrates meaningful capability in those domains without reaching the Critical threshold.

GPT-5.6 introduces a new naming convention in which the generation number (5.6) is paired with a durable capability tier name (Sol, Terra, or Luna), allowing each tier to advance on its own schedule. Terra carries the API identifier gpt-5.6-terra and supports the same reasoning effort controls available across the family, including adjustable reasoning depth. The model includes prompt caching with explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life, with cache writes billed at 1.25x the uncached input rate and cache reads receiving a 90% discount. GPT-5.6 Terra is a proprietary, closed-weights model served through the OpenAI API, Codex, and ChatGPT.

GLM-OCR vs GPT-5.6 Terra Comparison Table

PropertyGLM-OCRGPT-5.6 Terra
OrganizationZ.aiOpenAI
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.1M
Parameters0.9B
LicenseMITProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.50
Output $/1M$15.00
Vision Tasks
Document Question Answering
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
captioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
classificationDemo
object-detectionDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
76.12%
Avg Response Time3.69s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.3K
Median output tokens53
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0041
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)
OCR
Overall Score
87.34%
78.6%
Avg Response Time1.00s2.07s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens105
Median output tokens33
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0008
Focused Scene OCR
87.9%(87/99)
79.8%(79/99)
Handwritten Math
100%(10/10)
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
86.7%(26/30)
Text Recognition
90%(27/30)
83.3%(25/30)
VQA & Extraction
81.7%(49/60)
75%(45/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology