Roboflow

Gemma 4 31B vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemma 4 31B and GLM-OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemma 4 31B vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 4 31B
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 4 31B vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B is the largest dense model in Google's Gemma 4 family, built from the same research as Gemini 3 and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license. It supports a 256K token context window with text and image input, configurable thinking mode for step-by-step reasoning, and multilingual support across 140+ languages. The unquantized model fits on a single 80GB GPU.

For vision tasks, Gemma 4 31B supports image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and can output structured bounding boxes for UI element detection, making it useful for document parsing and UI understanding. Compared to Gemma 3, it delivers stronger reasoning and multimodal performance. It is part of a four-size family alongside the 26B A4B MoE variant and two on-device models (E2B, E4B), with the 31B dense variant optimized for output quality and fine-tuning over inference speed.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Gemma 4 31B vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 4 31BGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Mar 2026
Context Window256K
Parameters31B0.9B
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.120
Output $/1M$0.350
Vision Tasks
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
classificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
67.16%
Avg Response Time34.59s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens169
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
73.7%(14/19)
OCR
Overall Score
84.72%
87.34%
Avg Response Time11.82s1.00s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens290
Median output tokens131
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
86.9%(86/99)
87.9%(87/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
85%(51/60)
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology