Gemma 4 12B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Compare Gemma 4 12B and Qwen3.5 122B A10B side-by-side.

Compare Gemma 4 12B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Overview

Gemma 4 12B

Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.

This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is a high-capacity multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team as part of the Qwen3.5 model family. The architecture contains 122 billion total parameters while activating roughly 10 billion per token through sparse expert routing, allowing the model to balance large-scale reasoning ability with relatively efficient inference compared to dense models of similar size.

The model is designed to process both text and visual inputs within a unified multimodal framework, enabling tasks that require reasoning across images, documents, charts, and natural language. This makes it suitable for applications such as document understanding, diagram interpretation, and complex visual question answering.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports a native context window of approximately 256,000 tokens, which can be extended further through techniques such as YaRN scaling to support very long-context workloads. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it builds on earlier Qwen multimodal systems and provides developers with an open-weight model capable of handling demanding multimodal reasoning and analysis tasks.

Gemma 4 12B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 4 12BQwen3.5 122B A10B
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Feb 2026
Context Window256K
Parameters12B122B
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.260
Output $/1M$2.08
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Object Detection
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
62.69%
76.12%
Avg Response Time6.88s1.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.2K
Median output tokens7
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0003
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
40%(4/10)
Object Understanding
78.6%(11/14)
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
73.7%(14/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology