Roboflow

Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemma 4 12B and GLM-OCR side-by-side.

Compare Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemma 4 12B

Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.

This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 4 12BGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Mar 2026
Context Window
Parameters12B0.9B
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Vision Tasks
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question Answering
Captioning
Chart Question Answering
Document Question Answering
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
62.69%
Avg Response Time6.88s
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
78.6%(11/14)
Spatial Understanding
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
87.34%
Avg Response Time1.00s
Focused Scene OCR
87.9%(87/99)
Handwritten Math
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
81.7%(49/60)