Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR
Compare Gemma 4 12B and GLM-OCR side-by-side.
Compare Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR: Overview
Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.
This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.
GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.
At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.
Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table
| Property | Gemma 4 12B | GLM-OCR |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Z.ai | |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jun 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Context Window | — | — |
| Parameters | 12B | 0.9B |
| License | Apache 2.0 | MIT |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| OCR | Demo | |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | ||
| Captioning | ||
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 62.69% | |
| Avg Response Time | 6.88s | |
| Defect Detection | 73.3%(11/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 88.9%(8/9) | |
| Object Counting | 10%(1/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 78.6%(11/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 57.9%(11/19) | |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 87.34% | |
| Avg Response Time | 1.00s | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 87.9%(87/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 100%(10/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 90%(27/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 90%(27/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 81.7%(49/60) | |