Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, and Open Prompt.
Compare Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Gemini 3 Pro is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.
Models in this comparison
Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview
Gemini 3 Pro is Google DeepMind’s flagship multimodal frontier model, built for high-accuracy reasoning and large-scale context understanding across text, images, audio, video, code, and documents. It delivers major gains over Gemini 2.5 Pro, supported by a 1M-token window and strong performance on Google-reported benchmarks such as GPQA Diamond, MMMU-Pro, and Video-MMMU.
The model excels at structured outputs, tool use, and agentic coding, enabling complex multi-step workflows and analysis of entire books, codebases, or long videos in a single prompt. Positioned as Google’s top production model, it balances advanced reasoning with broad multimodal capabilities, making it well suited for research assistants, automation agents, coding systems, and enterprise-scale document and media analysis.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.
As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.
Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table
| Property | Gemini 3 Pro | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Nov 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Parameters | 397B | |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.385 | |
| Output $/1M | $2.45 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Object Detection | ||
| OCR | Demo | |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Classification | ||
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 58.21% | |
| Avg Response Time | 56.61s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 1.1K | |
| Median output tokens | 54 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0006 | |
| Defect Detection | 66.7%(10/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 77.8%(7/9) | |
| Object Counting | 20%(2/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 64.3%(9/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 57.9%(11/19) | |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 68.56% | |
| Avg Response Time | 7.45s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 122 | |
| Median output tokens | 20 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.0001 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 57.6%(57/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 80%(8/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 100%(30/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 70%(21/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 68.3%(41/60) | |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology