Roboflow

Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.5

Compare Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Classification, OCR, Image Captioning, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3 Pro

Gemini 3 Pro is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

OpenAIGPT-5.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI

Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.5: Overview

Gemini 3 Pro

Gemini 3 Pro is Google DeepMind’s flagship multimodal frontier model, built for high-accuracy reasoning and large-scale context understanding across text, images, audio, video, code, and documents. It delivers major gains over Gemini 2.5 Pro, supported by a 1M-token window and strong performance on Google-reported benchmarks such as GPQA Diamond, MMMU-Pro, and Video-MMMU.

The model excels at structured outputs, tool use, and agentic coding, enabling complex multi-step workflows and analysis of entire books, codebases, or long videos in a single prompt. Positioned as Google’s top production model, it balances advanced reasoning with broad multimodal capabilities, making it well suited for research assistants, automation agents, coding systems, and enterprise-scale document and media analysis.

GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 is a multimodal large language model released by OpenAI on April 23, 2026, engineered for autonomous, multi-step knowledge work and agentic workflows. It accepts text, images, and code as input, featuring enhanced spatial reasoning and visual grounding to support its computer use capabilities for operating software and navigating UI elements. Built to execute complex workflows end-to-end, the model interprets loosely defined tasks, selects appropriate tools, and performs self-verification with minimal user intervention. It is available in a standard version, a Thinking mode for extended reasoning budgets, and a Pro variant that uses parallel test-time compute for maximum precision on complex tasks.

Co-optimized with NVIDIA for GB200 NVL72 infrastructure, GPT-5.5 delivers per-token latency comparable to its predecessor GPT-5.4 while maintaining a 1-million-token context window. Despite increased capability, the model achieves greater token efficiency in coding and data analysis workflows, often completing tasks with fewer total tokens than previous versions. OpenAI reports a 60% reduction in hallucination rate compared to GPT-5.4, improving reliability for accuracy-sensitive applications. API access is available via the Responses and Chat Completions endpoints at $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens, double the unit price of GPT-5.4.

Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.5 Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3 ProGPT-5.5
OrganizationGoogleOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateNov 2025Apr 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$5.00
Output $/1M$30.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
77.61%
Avg Response Time30.12s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.4K
Median output tokens138
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.011
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
81.22%
Avg Response Time5.16s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens105
Median output tokens83
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0030
Focused Scene OCR
77.8%(77/99)
Handwritten Math
40%(4/10)
License Plate Recognition
93.3%(28/30)
Text Recognition
83.3%(25/30)
VQA & Extraction
86.7%(52/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology