Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is a flagship multimodal vision-language model developed by Qwen (Alibaba Cloud), designed for instruction-following tasks that combine advanced text generation with visual understanding. It serves as a high-end open-weight model for developers and researchers building multimodal AI systems that require strong reasoning, perception, and long-context capabilities.

The model supports interleaved text and image inputs, very long context windows (up to roughly 256K tokens), and efficient inference through a mixture-of-experts architecture with about 22B active parameters out of 235B total. In today’s landscape, it competes with top-tier proprietary vision-language models while offering the advantages of open weights and flexible deployment. Typical applications include multimodal assistants, document and image analysis, visual reasoning, and large-context instruction-based workflows.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OrganizationGoogleQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Sep 2025
Context Window1.0M256K
Parameters235B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50$0.200
Output $/1M$9.00$0.880
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Vision Language
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
79.1%
Avg Response Time6.71s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens294
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0043
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
60%(6/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology