Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-OCR

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM-OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash
Run to compare this model.
Z.aiGLM-OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-OCR: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.

Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

GLM-OCR

GLM-OCR is a multimodal OCR model for complex document understanding, built on the GLM-V encoder-decoder architecture by Zhipu AI. The model combines a 0.4B-parameter CogViT visual encoder pre-trained on large-scale image-text data, a lightweight cross-modal connector with efficient token downsampling, and a 0.5B-parameter GLM language decoder, totaling 0.9B parameters. To address the inefficiency of standard autoregressive decoding in deterministic OCR tasks, GLM-OCR introduces a Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) mechanism that predicts multiple tokens per step, significantly improving decoding throughput while keeping memory overhead low through shared parameters. Training proceeds through four stages: visual encoder pretraining with MIM, CLIP, and distillation objectives; vision-language pretraining on document parsing, grounding, and VQA data; supervised fine-tuning on curated OCR datasets covering text, formula, table, and key information extraction; and full-task reinforcement learning to improve accuracy and structural consistency.

At the system level, GLM-OCR adopts a two-stage pipeline in which PP-DocLayout-V3 first performs layout analysis, followed by parallel region-level recognition. This design enables robust handling of diverse document layouts including tables, formulas, and multi-column text. The model supports document parsing and targeted recognition tasks, producing structured outputs in Markdown, JSON, and LaTeX formats across more than 100 languages. On the OmniDocBench V1.5 benchmark, GLM-OCR scores 94.62, and achieves 94.0 on OCRBench and 96.5 on UniMERNet for formula recognition.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM-OCR Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.5 FlashGLM-OCR
OrganizationGoogleZ.ai
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2026Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M
Parameters0.9B
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.50
Output $/1M$9.00
Vision Tasks
Chart Question Answering
Document Question Answering
OCRDemoDemo
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
captioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
Vision Language
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
79.1%
Avg Response Time6.71s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens294
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0043
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
60%(6/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
90.39%
87.34%
Avg Response Time4.86s1.00s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens196
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0034
Focused Scene OCR
90.9%(90/99)
87.9%(87/99)
Handwritten Math
90%(9/10)
100%(10/10)
License Plate Recognition
100%(30/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
86.7%(52/60)
81.7%(49/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology