Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B
Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemma 4 26B A4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.
Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B on Vision Evals
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on all six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Counting, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 80.6% to 43.2%.
Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash averages 86.0% (#2 of 53) against 63.6% (#42 of 53) for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper ($0.0019 vs $0.011 per sample), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster (14.8s vs 27.8s per sample).
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B Comparison Table
Evals updated September 5, 2026Pricing updated September 8, 2026
| Property | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | ||
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | May 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 256K |
| Parameters | 25.2B | |
| License | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $1.50 | $0.070 |
| Output $/1M | $9.00 | $0.340 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 86.0% | 63.6% |
| Quantizationsself-hosted | ||
| Avg cost / sample | $0.011 | $0.0019 |
| Avg speed / sample | 14.77s | 27.84s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | 70.6% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 68.7 to 72.6 | 44.2% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 43.5 to 44.8 |
| Object Detection (high) | 69.8% ±1.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.5 to 71.1 | – |
| Counting (low) | 80.6% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.7 to 81.1 | 43.2% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 41.9 to 46.0 |
| Counting (high) | 82.4% ±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 82.4 | – |
| Identification (low) | 99.0% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0 | 81.3% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.1 to 84.4 |
| Identification (high) | 97.9% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 100.0 | – |
| OCR (low) | 89.3% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.0 to 91.1 | 88.7% ±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.6 to 90.2 |
| OCR (high) | 88.9% ±0.2, Mean of 3 runs, range 88.7 to 89.1 | – |
| Data Extraction (low) | 94.5% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 94.8 | 76.6% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.3 to 77.3 |
| Data Extraction (high) | 95.5% ±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9 | – |
| Reasoning (low) | 82.1% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.1 to 84.1 | 47.7% ±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 45.0 to 49.0 |
| Reasoning (high) | 81.0% ±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 79.5 to 82.8 | – |
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: Overview
Gemini 3.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google DeepMind and released at Google I/O 2026. It is built on the Gemini 3 Flash reasoning foundation and introduces configurable thinking levels (minimal, low, medium, and high) that allow developers to tune the depth of internal reasoning before a response is generated. The model accepts text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs and produces text output, with a 1 million token context window and up to 65,000 output tokens per request. It is natively multimodal, processing visual inputs alongside text to support tasks such as image captioning, classification, optical character recognition, object detection, and visual grounding, where the model references specific regions within an image or video frame.
Its vision capabilities extend to interpreting UI screenshots, diagrams, charts, and real-world scenes, as well as understanding video and live frame sequences for activity and scene recognition. The model supports combined tool use, including Google Search, URL context, code execution, and custom functions, within a single request, and it uses reasoning context from previous turns when thought signatures are present in the conversation history, enabling persistent multi-turn reasoning chains. Gemini 3.5 Flash carries a knowledge cutoff of January 2026 and is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, and the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.
Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.
For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.