Roboflow

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3 Flash

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, Classification, Object Detection, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3 Flash on Vision Evals

Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on 3 of the five Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 57.5% to 38.6%.

Overall, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite averages 61.7% (#33 of 63) against 65.7% (#27 of 63) for Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is both cheaper ($0.0014 vs $0.0024 per sample) and faster (3.9s vs 5.8s per sample).

Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3 Flash Comparison Table

Evals updated October 13, 2026Pricing updated October 19, 2026

PropertyGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3 Flash
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2026Dec 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.300$0.500
Output $/1M$2.50$3.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Video ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
61.7%
65.7%
Avg cost / sample$0.0014$0.0024
Avg speed / sample3.92s5.83s
By task
Object Detection
57.5%
$0.0023
38.6%
$0.0031
Counting
52.7%
$0.0007
67.6%
$0.0012
Identification
84.4%
$0.0004
93.8%
$0.0009
OCR (low)
65.8%
$0.0012
63.9%
$0.0024
by category
Single value
64.3%
Transcription
87.5%
Structured JSON
75.8%
Text localization
31.9%
Single value
63.9%
Transcription
90.5%
Structured JSON
80.2%
Text localization
7.6%
OCR (high)
71.2%
$0.0063
73.1%
$0.013
by category
Single value
66.1%
Transcription
88.6%
Structured JSON
82.1%
Text localization
46.4%
Single value
69.1%
Transcription
90.0%
Structured JSON
87.5%
Text localization
36.9%
Reasoning (low)
48.3%
$0.0012
64.9%
$0.0020
Reasoning (high)
68.9%
$0.0042
74.2%
$0.0040

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3 Flash: Overview

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model developed by Google DeepMind, released on July 21, 2026 as part of the Gemini 3.5 model family. It is the fastest model in the 3.5 series, designed for both low-latency tasks and high-throughput production workloads such as agentic search, document processing, receipt translation, and large-scale data extraction. The model accepts text, images, audio, and video as inputs, with a context window of up to 1 million tokens, and produces text output. It supports configurable thinking levels, allowing developers to tune the balance between response quality, cost, and latency depending on workload requirements.

On agentic and coding benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms its predecessor, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, including on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (54% vs. 31%), GDM-MRCR v2 long-context (72.2% vs. 60.1%), and real-world task execution as measured by GDPval-AA v2 (1140 vs. 642). It also surpasses Gemini 3 Flash on SWE-Bench Pro (54.2% vs. 49.6%) and OSWorld-Verified (74.0% vs. 65.1%). According to the Artificial Analysis Index, the model generates output at approximately 350 tokens per second. It is built on the Gemini 3.5 Flash foundation and is evaluated across reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, multilingual performance, and long-context tasks. The model is developed under Google's Frontier Safety Framework.

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by Google through Google DeepMind, designed to deliver fast, cost-efficient reasoning across real-time products and developer workflows. Released in December 2025, it is the Flash-tier variant of the Gemini 3 family, balancing low latency with reasoning quality approaching Pro models.

The model supports text, images, audio, and video, with an exceptionally large context window of roughly one million input tokens and outputs up to ~65k tokens. It emphasizes rapid responses for coding, summarization, analysis, and agentic tasks, and exposes configurable “thinking levels” via API to trade speed for deeper reasoning. Today, Gemini 3 Flash positions itself as a high-throughput, production-ready model, serving as the default in the Gemini app and Google Search’s AI Mode, optimized for scalable, interactive AI applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Gemini 3 Flash performed better. It scores higher on 3 of the five vision tasks and averages 65.7% (#27 of 63) against 61.7% (#33 of 63) for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

Yes. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark at low effort, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads with 57.5% against 38.6%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0014 per sample against $0.0024. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is priced at $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $2.50 per 1M output; Gemini 3 Flash is priced at $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $3.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 3.9s per inference against 5.8s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.