Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Object Detection, OCR, Open Prompt, and Classification.
Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.8 Flash live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.8 Flash Comparison Table
Evals updated September 3, 2026Pricing updated September 3, 2026
| Property | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Jul 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 125B total, 6B active (+51B N-gram embeddings) | |
| License | Proprietary | Custom |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.400 | $0.470 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 68.8% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0004 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 6.48s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection (low) | – | 59.8% ±1.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 58.5 to 60.8 |
| Object Detection (high) | – | 67.0% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 65.3 to 68.5 |
| Counting (low) | – | 56.3% ±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 54.0 to 59.5 |
| Counting (high) | – | 68.0% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 67.6 to 68.9 |
| Identification (low) | – | 88.5% ±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 90.6 |
| Identification (high) | – | 86.5% ±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 84.4 to 90.6 |
| OCR (low) | – | 88.0% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.8 to 88.9 |
| OCR (high) | – | 91.3% ±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.8 to 91.9 |
| Data Extraction (low) | – | 84.9% ±1.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.5 to 86.6 |
| Data Extraction (high) | – | 84.5% ±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 83.5 to 85.6 |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 35.1% ±3.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 31.1 to 37.8 |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 69.5% ±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 68.9 to 70.2 |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.8 Flash: Overview
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, released for general availability on July 22, 2025, is the most cost-efficient model in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed for high-volume and latency-sensitive tasks. It is multimodal, supporting text, images, video, audio, and PDFs as inputs, with text as its primary output. The model handles up to 1 million input tokens and generates outputs up to 64K tokens, making it suitable for large-scale document or media processing at low cost. It is built on a Sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with native multimodal support, though exact parameter counts are undisclosed.
Flash-Lite offers the lowest usage cost among Gemini 2.5 models. It introduces developer controls for “thinking mode,” allowing fine-tuning of reasoning depth vs. efficiency. It also integrates native tools such as code execution, search grounding, and URL context. While strong on translation, classification, coding, and general multimodal reasoning, it lacks support for image or audio generation in its stable release and is less capable than Gemini 2.5 Flash or Pro on complex reasoning-heavy workflows.
Qwen3.8-Flash is a multimodal mixture-of-experts model from the Qwen team at Alibaba, and the production counterpart of the open-weight Qwen3.8-Flash-Next preview that introduces the architecture intended for the Qwen4 family. The main model carries 125 billion parameters alongside a separate 51 billion parameter N-gram embedding table, while activating roughly 6 billion parameters per token. It accepts interleaved image and text input and returns text, handling 262,144 tokens of context natively with extension to 1,000,000 tokens using YaRN. The production configuration runs with the 1M context window by default and adds built-in tool support.
Four architectural changes separate it from earlier Qwen releases: hybrid attention that pairs Gated DeltaNet for history compression with Qwen Sparse Attention, which uses a lightweight indexer to select micro-blocks of context; a Gated Residual scheme; N-gram embeddings; and training with the Muon optimizer, refined around orthogonalization accuracy and the division of parameters between Muon and AdamW. Qwen reports training cost around one ninth that of Qwen3.7-Plus, with QSA attention kernels measured up to 7.6 times faster in prefill and 4.9 times faster in decode at 1M-token context. Reported scores include 58.7 on DeepSWE 1.1, 62.5 on SWE-bench Pro, 84.5 on AndroidWorld and 95.7 on MathVision.
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is released under Proprietary, while Qwen3.8 Flash uses Custom. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.