Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3.7 Plus side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Object Detection, OCR, Open Prompt, and Classification.
Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.7 Plus live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.7 Plus Comparison Table
Evals updated September 3, 2026Pricing updated September 3, 2026
| Property | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Qwen | |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | — |
| Release Date | Jul 2025 | Jun 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | — |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.320 |
| Output $/1M | $0.400 | $1.28 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Vision Language | ||
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | Not evaluated | 67.4% |
| Avg cost / sample | – | $0.0008 |
| Avg speed / sample | – | 7.01s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | – | 60.1% |
| Counting | – | 50.0% |
| Identification | – | 84.4% |
| OCR | – | 86.5% |
| Data Extraction | – | 83.5% |
| Reasoning (low) | – | 39.7% |
| Reasoning (high) | – | 68.2% |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.7 Plus: Overview
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, released for general availability on July 22, 2025, is the most cost-efficient model in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed for high-volume and latency-sensitive tasks. It is multimodal, supporting text, images, video, audio, and PDFs as inputs, with text as its primary output. The model handles up to 1 million input tokens and generates outputs up to 64K tokens, making it suitable for large-scale document or media processing at low cost. It is built on a Sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with native multimodal support, though exact parameter counts are undisclosed.
Flash-Lite offers the lowest usage cost among Gemini 2.5 models. It introduces developer controls for “thinking mode,” allowing fine-tuning of reasoning depth vs. efficiency. It also integrates native tools such as code execution, search grounding, and URL context. While strong on translation, classification, coding, and general multimodal reasoning, it lacks support for image or audio generation in its stable release and is less capable than Gemini 2.5 Flash or Pro on complex reasoning-heavy workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has not yet been evaluated on Roboflow's current Vision Evals, so this comparison shows specs, licensing, and pricing rather than benchmark scores.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and object detection in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.