Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 12B

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 4 12B side-by-side.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 12B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 12B: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, released for general availability on July 22, 2025, is the most cost-efficient model in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed for high-volume and latency-sensitive tasks. It is multimodal, supporting text, images, video, audio, and PDFs as inputs, with text as its primary output. The model handles up to 1 million input tokens and generates outputs up to 64K tokens, making it suitable for large-scale document or media processing at low cost. It is built on a Sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with native multimodal support, though exact parameter counts are undisclosed.

Flash-Lite offers the lowest usage cost among Gemini 2.5 models. It introduces developer controls for “thinking mode,” allowing fine-tuning of reasoning depth vs. efficiency. It also integrates native tools such as code execution, search grounding, and URL context. While strong on translation, classification, coding, and general multimodal reasoning, it lacks support for image or audio generation in its stable release and is less capable than Gemini 2.5 Flash or Pro on complex reasoning-heavy workflows.

Gemma 4 12B

Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.

This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 4 12B Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemma 4 12B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJul 2025Jun 2026
Context Window1.0M
Parameters12B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.100
Output $/1M$0.400
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
53.73%
62.69%
Avg Response Time7.19s6.88s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens6
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0000
Defect Detection
66.7%(10/15)
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
78.6%(11/14)
Spatial Understanding
47.4%(9/19)
57.9%(11/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology