Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.5 397B A17B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is a 397B-parameter (17B active) open-weight multimodal model developed by Alibaba’s Qwen team, released on 2026-02-16 under Apache-2.0. It supports text and image inputs with text outputs, combining a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture with Gated Delta Networks for efficient scaling. The model provides native vision-language reasoning and a large ~262K token context window, extendable to ~1M tokens.

As the first open-weight release in the Qwen3.5 family, it positions itself as a high-capacity, long-context alternative in the large vision-language space, balancing scale and efficiency via sparse activation. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding, agent workflows, and multimodal understanding tasks.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5 397B A17B
OrganizationAnthropicQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Feb 2026
Context Window1.0M262K
Parameters397B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.385
Output $/1M$10.00$2.45
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
58.21%
Avg Response Time3.90s56.61s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.1K1.1K
Median output tokens6154
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0048$0.0006
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
68.56%
Avg Response Time2.77s7.45s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens642122
Median output tokens6420
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0019$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
88.9%(88/99)
57.6%(57/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
70%(21/30)
VQA & Extraction
80%(48/60)
68.3%(41/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology